지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the linguistic context, possession is a fundamental notion which may be defined as an asymmetric relationship between two referents, the possessor versus the possessee. It is a universal domain, that is, any human language can be expected to have conventionalized expression for it. Nevertheless, the linguistic possessive expressions don't seem to represent explicitly the cognitive nature of possession. The range of conceptual meaning of possession is too wide to be reduced to several possessive constructions. It can be represented by the various types of structure both within a particular language and in cross-linguistic comparison.
There is a specific type of possessive construction in Czech. That is the so-called dative of possession, which appears, of course, not only in Czech but also in most of Slavic languages. According to the grammatical descriptions, the usage of this type of dative case in Slavic languages ranges from absent Ukrainian to widespread Czech. It is one of the types of free dative syntactically ungoverned by a verb. It is fundamentally the case category which is not assigned by a lexical property of a predicate. However, in some case it seems to be associated with the property of beneficiary and experiencer, the semantic roles of dative argument. Nevertheless, the dative of possession is generally considered to lack the prototypical semantic feature such as [+DIRECTIONAL to the object] and the peripheral feature [+BENEFACTIVE of the action or state of affairs]. It is rather assumed to have its proper feature [+POSSESSIVE].
This paper argues whether the dative of possession is used to express possession at all and if so whether it expresses solely possession or a more complex content, to what extent it possesses the proper feature [+POSSESSIVE] and which factors enables the appearance of this type of dative. In order to check the existence of the feature [+POSSESSIVE], four analytic manipulations are used as follows. (1) Compatibility between the dative of possession and the possessive determiners (2) Existence of the pragmatic feature [+EMPHATIC] differentiated from possessive determiners (3) Vagueness of boundary line between the dative of possession and dativus (in-)commodi (4) Co-occurrence (or double distribution) of both the dative of possession and possessive determiners.
This paper proposes that unlike the possessive determiners, the dative of possession in Czech is assumed to have relatively week semantic feature of possession but the strong pragmatic feature [AFFECTEDNESS via POSSESSION] in other words, the speaker's empathy. The dative of possession which appears as the possessor of inalienable body parts shows relatively strong possessive feature.
There is a specific type of possessive construction in Czech. That is the so-called dative of possession, which appears, of course, not only in Czech but also in most of Slavic languages. According to the grammatical descriptions, the usage of this type of dative case in Slavic languages ranges from absent Ukrainian to widespread Czech. It is one of the types of free dative syntactically ungoverned by a verb. It is fundamentally the case category which is not assigned by a lexical property of a predicate. However, in some case it seems to be associated with the property of beneficiary and experiencer, the semantic roles of dative argument. Nevertheless, the dative of possession is generally considered to lack the prototypical semantic feature such as [+DIRECTIONAL to the object] and the peripheral feature [+BENEFACTIVE of the action or state of affairs]. It is rather assumed to have its proper feature [+POSSESSIVE].
This paper argues whether the dative of possession is used to express possession at all and if so whether it expresses solely possession or a more complex content, to what extent it possesses the proper feature [+POSSESSIVE] and which factors enables the appearance of this type of dative. In order to check the existence of the feature [+POSSESSIVE], four analytic manipulations are used as follows. (1) Compatibility between the dative of possession and the possessive determiners (2) Existence of the pragmatic feature [+EMPHATIC] differentiated from possessive determiners (3) Vagueness of boundary line between the dative of possession and dativus (in-)commodi (4) Co-occurrence (or double distribution) of both the dative of possession and possessive determiners.
This paper proposes that unlike the possessive determiners, the dative of possession in Czech is assumed to have relatively week semantic feature of possession but the strong pragmatic feature [AFFECTEDNESS via POSSESSION] in other words, the speaker's empathy. The dative of possession which appears as the possessor of inalienable body parts shows relatively strong possessive feature.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 체코어의 여격구문: 논항여격 & 자유여격
Ⅲ. 소유여격의 언어보편 가능성
Ⅳ. 소유여격의 [+POSSESSIVE] 자질 점검
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (19)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김인천 / 2008 / Types of Free Dative in Czech and Implications for Simplex Classification / 동유럽연구 21 : 3 ~ 28
2. [단행본] - 양창렬 / 2007 / 러시아어 생격과 여격의 소유의미 연구 / 한국학술정보(주)
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이인영 / 2008 / 소위 ‘소유 여격’에 대하여: 러시아어에서 소유형용사, 생격, У+생격 및 수혜 여격과의 비교 / 러시아연구 18 (1) : 187 ~ 218
4. [단행본] - Chappell, H. / 1996 / The grammar of inalienability: A topological perspectvie on body part terms and the part-whole relation / Mouton de Gruyter
5. [단행본] - Grepl, M. / 1986 / Skladba spisovné češtiny / SPN
2. [단행본] - 양창렬 / 2007 / 러시아어 생격과 여격의 소유의미 연구 / 한국학술정보(주)
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이인영 / 2008 / 소위 ‘소유 여격’에 대하여: 러시아어에서 소유형용사, 생격, У+생격 및 수혜 여격과의 비교 / 러시아연구 18 (1) : 187 ~ 218
4. [단행본] - Chappell, H. / 1996 / The grammar of inalienability: A topological perspectvie on body part terms and the part-whole relation / Mouton de Gruyter
5. [단행본] - Grepl, M. / 1986 / Skladba spisovné češtiny / SPN
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
러시아어의 여격 명사구는 모두 논항인가? : '소유'를 나타내는 여격 명사구를 중심으로
슬라브학보
2001 .12
-
On the Distribution of Semantic Classes of Dative Verbs in Syntactic Constructions in Korean
언어
2019 .06
-
Verb Sensitivity of the English Dative Alternation: Experimental Evidence from Give-type Verbs
담화와인지
2019 .11
-
A Lexical Feature-based Analysis for the English Dative Alternation
영어영문학
2019 .11
-
A constraint-based approach to Korean dative cases
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2005 .05
-
Korean Dative-Nominative-Predicate Constructions as a Reference Point Phenomenon
담화와인지
2018 .11
-
소유동사의 의미 고찰
국제언어문학
2006 .12
-
The Demonstrative Ku 'He' Binding in the Dative Construction
언어학 연구
2010 .04
-
Syntax and Statistical Learning in the Language Development of the English Dative Alternation
영어영문학연구
2013 .01
-
한국인 L2화자의 여격 구문 인식에 관한 연구
새한영어영문학
2015 .08
-
소유의 존재론 : 사르트르를 중심으로
철학논총
2018 .04
-
Types of Free Dative in Czech and Implications for Simplex Classification
동유럽발칸연구
2008 .01
-
영어 소유격의 통사구조와 양화적 속성
언어과학연구
2005 .12
-
Structure Persistence in L1 and L2 Production of English Dative Structure
언어과학연구
2008 .09
-
러시아어 ‘위협’의 여격 표지
슬라브학보
2015 .12
-
On the Dative Intervention Effect on Raising to Subject
생성문법연구
2005 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-309-002060792