메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한토목학회 KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING Vol.10 No.4
발행연도
2006.7
수록면
265 - 274 (10page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Testing results of six existing prestressed concrete bridges are used to evaluate analytical methodology. These bridges cover different span lengths, number of lanes, and skew angles. Strains, load distribution factors, and ratings predicted by finite element analyses and AASHTO code specifications were compared with those from measurements. The comparison revealed a significant difference between numerically simulated and measured results due to the effects of many field factors. Factors that exist in reality but whose effects on bridge performance cannot easily be quantified are defined as field factors. Due to thses field factors, existing bridges are different from idealized models and are thus defined as fields bridges. To examine this difference and to quantify their effects, some field factors were modeled in a more refined finite element analysis. It is found that field factors have a larger effect on the maximum strain than on the load distribution factor. Parametric studies of the effects of diaphragms, bearing stiffness, and shew angles on the load distribution and maximum strain were conducted.

목차

Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Testing of Field Bridges
3. Finite Element Modeling of Field Factors
4. Load Distribution and Ratings
5. Analytical Versus Test Results
6. Conclusions
REFERENCE

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-531-019098854