지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
It is a commonly held view that one of the most heated debates in the Korean history research circle during the 1980s was one on social status inearly Joseon period. The controversy started with the publication of “Joseonchogi Yangbanyeongu (A Research of Yangban Class in the Early Joseon Period)" by Yi Seong-mu, who divided the society of Joseon dynasty into four social status groups, to which Han Young-woo, author of the dual status theory of Yangcheonje (commoners versus salves status system), raised objection. As the debate intensified, with Yi disputing Han’s argument, Han voicing dissent with Yi again and Song Jun-ho intervening in the controversy, itdrew keen attentions not only from the researchers of Joseon dynasty but also the entire Korean history research circle.
“Yangbanyeongu (The Research on Yangban class)" by Yi Seong -mu was a labored work, shedding lights on concrete features of Yangban status in diverse aspects of politics, economy, sociology and philosophy, while compiling wide range of views on the ruling class of Joseon dynasty. According to the work of Yi, Yangban was a factual ruling class of Joseon society with an upper hand over middle class, Jungin,and its subordinates, commoners and slaves. Joseon dynasty wasestablished as Yangban bureaucrat’s state, and the social structureas such has not changed much during the 500 years of the dynasty.
In contrast, Han Young-woo argued that the social status of the early Joseon period had only two statuses, commoners and slaves, with Yangban merely referring to the ‘government post-holders’ among the commoners, on the ground that those of Yangban class received no privileged treatment, having equal rights (to serve as bureaucrats) and duties (to pay taxes and fulfill military service) to others. Han held the view that Joseon dynasty could strengthen its centralized state power in its direct control of commoners, based on Yangcheonje system. It was as late as in late 16th century that Yangban was established as a privileged class. Given this fact, it was in mid- or late 16th century, at the earliest, that Joseon society was divided into four status groups ruling Yangban group, Jungin middle group and lower group, commoners and slaves.
Controversies involving the “four social status theory" and the dual status theory of “Yangcheonje" were also expanded into following crucial issues how to evaluate mobility in social status of the early Joseon society whether to confirm the existence of Yangban class as rulers in early Joseon period, how to define the characteristics of the dynasty as a state, and how to designate the point of time when the ruling class came into existence. This dissertation explores the academic significance of Yangcheonje theory, based on Han Young-woo’s "Socio-Economic Research on Early Joseon Period."
“Yangbanyeongu (The Research on Yangban class)" by Yi Seong -mu was a labored work, shedding lights on concrete features of Yangban status in diverse aspects of politics, economy, sociology and philosophy, while compiling wide range of views on the ruling class of Joseon dynasty. According to the work of Yi, Yangban was a factual ruling class of Joseon society with an upper hand over middle class, Jungin,and its subordinates, commoners and slaves. Joseon dynasty wasestablished as Yangban bureaucrat’s state, and the social structureas such has not changed much during the 500 years of the dynasty.
In contrast, Han Young-woo argued that the social status of the early Joseon period had only two statuses, commoners and slaves, with Yangban merely referring to the ‘government post-holders’ among the commoners, on the ground that those of Yangban class received no privileged treatment, having equal rights (to serve as bureaucrats) and duties (to pay taxes and fulfill military service) to others. Han held the view that Joseon dynasty could strengthen its centralized state power in its direct control of commoners, based on Yangcheonje system. It was as late as in late 16th century that Yangban was established as a privileged class. Given this fact, it was in mid- or late 16th century, at the earliest, that Joseon society was divided into four status groups ruling Yangban group, Jungin middle group and lower group, commoners and slaves.
Controversies involving the “four social status theory" and the dual status theory of “Yangcheonje" were also expanded into following crucial issues how to evaluate mobility in social status of the early Joseon society whether to confirm the existence of Yangban class as rulers in early Joseon period, how to define the characteristics of the dynasty as a state, and how to designate the point of time when the ruling class came into existence. This dissertation explores the academic significance of Yangcheonje theory, based on Han Young-woo’s "Socio-Economic Research on Early Joseon Period."
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 내용 소개
Ⅲ. 양천제설의 대두
Ⅳ. 연구사적 의의
Ⅴ. 마무리
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조선 兩班의 객관적 실체에 대한 종합적 이해 : 李成茂의 『朝鮮初期 兩班硏究』를 중심으로
한국사연구
2009 .09
-
[조선전기] 조선전기사 : 연구의 집적과 쟁점의 부각
역사학보
2011 .09
-
중국소설 《西遊記》 번역본의 조선후기 유통에 관한 연구 : 영남대 소장 번역필사본을 중심으로
중국어문논역총간
2017 .01
-
The Concept of History and as Seen by Korean Yangban
Korea Journal
1977 .09
-
양반을 향한 긴 여정 : 조선 후기 어느 하천민 가계의 성장
역사비평
2012 .02
-
조선후기 입양의 확산 추이와 수용 양상
역사와현실
2009 .09
-
조선후기 刀劒 素材 科擧 答案사례에 대한 一考察 -｢劒策問｣과 ｢劒對策文｣을 중심으로-
동방한문학
2020 .01
-
환웅, 삼조선과 부여ㆍ고구려ㆍ요ㆍ금ㆍ원ㆍ청의 계보 : 지식형태사에 입각한 한국과 방계의 역사
고조선단군학
2007 .06
-
[조선후기] 팽창, 다양화, 모색 : 2009~2010 조선후기사 연구 동향
역사학보
2011 .09
-
김대건 가문의 신분에 대한 재검토
교회사연구
2011 .12
-
1900년대 ｢光武戶籍｣의 ‘士’와 ｢民籍｣의 ‘兩班’ 기재
대동문화연구
2013 .01
-
조선시대 婦權의 존재 양상 연구
동양고전연구
2018 .01
-
Low-class Commoners during the Koryŏ Dynasty
International Journal of Korean History
2004 .12
-
15세기 奴良妻交婚 정책과 교혼 실태
古文書硏究
2006 .01
-
朝鮮 初期 中國語 通譯 發展 背景에 관한 硏究 －≪朝鮮王朝實錄≫의 記錄을 中心으로－
중국어문학
2015 .01
-
카자흐스탄 고려인 극작가 한진의 고전 수용 양상 : 「량반전」과 「토끼의 모험」을 중심으로
국어국문학
2012 .12
-
朝鮮初期 兩班硏究, 李成茂 著, 一潮閣刊 1980年 2月 菊版 424面
한국사연구
1980 .09
-
Characteristics of Agricultural Techniques in 18th and 19th Century Joseon Dynasty
Korea Journal
2003 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018887251