지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Modern western culture has been criticized by some western scholars who engaged in self-reflective criticism on it. Th. Adorno and M. Horkheimer’s “dialectics of enlightenment” and Edward S. Said’s “orientalism” are representative of such self-reflective approaches to modern culture. This paper focused on shedding light on peculiarities of Enlightenment and Romanticism in relation to their understanding of human freedom, relationship between individual humans and communities(state or nation), and relationship between East and West. Enlightenment is based on the idea of modern subjectivity’s Freedom and human ability to conceive and control the others by his Reason, while Romanticism on the confidence in feeling, imagination, intuition, inspiration, revelation as mediators between finite and infinite.
However, these two categories share the liberalist individualism as their fundamental principle and evince some ambiguities of both the liberalism discourses per se and the way of realization of ideas in reality. The ambiguities may be realized toward the direction of positive thesis or negative antithesis. At the end of the 18-th century and the beginning of the 19-th century, Russian society introduced both liberalism flows at the same time, integrating Russian Romanticism, which engages in formulating Russian national identity between East and West, especially in the process of colonizing Southern region of Russia. In Russia, western orientalism discourses, activated in the late 18th-the early 19th centuries, were transformed into more ambiguous versions because of the boundary position of Russia in the triple relationship of ‘West-Russia-East(especially Caucasus region).
This study analyzed the idea of Freedom and the ambiguities of orientalism with Englightment and Romanticism integrated mixed together, focusing on Pushkin’s last and best southern romantic epic, “Gypsies.” The text is characterized for Pushkin’s ambiguity of romanticist and enlightenment orientalism discourses than in Western original models and his tendency of de-romantification and multi-facetedeness with a tinge of irony. Given the constant tendency that ambiguities of enlightenment and romanticism are realized in reality in the direction of antithesis, it appears time to engage in devising the “third way” of transforming the antithesis of modern liberalism discourses into the thesis.
However, these two categories share the liberalist individualism as their fundamental principle and evince some ambiguities of both the liberalism discourses per se and the way of realization of ideas in reality. The ambiguities may be realized toward the direction of positive thesis or negative antithesis. At the end of the 18-th century and the beginning of the 19-th century, Russian society introduced both liberalism flows at the same time, integrating Russian Romanticism, which engages in formulating Russian national identity between East and West, especially in the process of colonizing Southern region of Russia. In Russia, western orientalism discourses, activated in the late 18th-the early 19th centuries, were transformed into more ambiguous versions because of the boundary position of Russia in the triple relationship of ‘West-Russia-East(especially Caucasus region).
This study analyzed the idea of Freedom and the ambiguities of orientalism with Englightment and Romanticism integrated mixed together, focusing on Pushkin’s last and best southern romantic epic, “Gypsies.” The text is characterized for Pushkin’s ambiguity of romanticist and enlightenment orientalism discourses than in Western original models and his tendency of de-romantification and multi-facetedeness with a tinge of irony. Given the constant tendency that ambiguities of enlightenment and romanticism are realized in reality in the direction of antithesis, it appears time to engage in devising the “third way” of transforming the antithesis of modern liberalism discourses into the thesis.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가기 : 근대 자유주의에 대한 자기반성
Ⅱ. 계몽주의와 낭만주의 담론들과 러시아의 오리엔탈리즘
Ⅲ. 「집시들」 : 푸쉬킨의 낭만주의적 오리엔탈리즘의 모호성
Ⅳ. 맺는 말 : 오리엔탈리즘의 극복을 위하여
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Modern Transformation of Korean Identity : Enlightenment and Orientalism
Korea Journal
2006 .03
-
푸시킨 서사시 「카프카즈의 포로」의 문학사적 의의에 관하여
러시아어문학연구논집
2019 .01
-
프랑스와 러시아 문화에 나타난 인류의 지적 소용돌이, ‘계몽(주의)’
인문과학
2012 .12
-
낭만적 민족주의와 역사문학 장르 : 베스투제프의 『배신자』와 푸쉬킨의 『보리스 고두노프』
슬라브학보
2011 .09
-
『바흐치사라이 분수』에 나타난 낭만주의적 서사의 역동성과 침묵의 미학
외국문학연구
2005 .11
-
Ambiguity in Language
중어중문학
2011 .08
-
그림 형제와 푸쉬킨 낭만주의 민담 비교 연구
슬라브학보
2013 .09
-
한국 모노크롬미술의 ‘정체성담론’에 대한 탈식민주의적 고찰
인문논총
2010 .01
-
現代繪畵의 展開와 Orientalism
동서문화
1968 .07
-
Folklore in A. S. Pushkin’s Works- A Bibliography for Building Pushkin House-of-Folklore -
슬라브硏究
2005 .01
-
К размышлению о мировоззрении Пушкина: “Праздник жизни” или “степь” жизни?
외국학연구
2013 .01
-
임화 문학의 낭만성 연구
어문논총
2013 .08
-
오리엔탈리즘의 두 얼굴 : 세속적 오리엔탈리즘과 구도적 오리엔탈리즘
동서비교문학저널
1998 .12
-
근대계몽기 가사(歌辭)와 개인의 발견- 신문과 잡지 수록 작품의 일단을 중심으로 -
한국문학논총
2019 .01
-
영국 디아스포라 사회에 나타난 오리엔탈리즘—하니프 쿠레이쉬의 『도시 교외의 부처』를 중심으로
영어영문학21
2014 .01
-
안드레이 비토프의 『푸쉬킨 연구소』와 부조리 문학
슬라브학보
2018 .06
-
불가코프의 푸시킨: 거장과 마르가리타 속 푸시킨의 형상과 작품들
러시아어문학연구논집
2016 .01
-
К истории пушкиноведения: Л.С. Сидяков и его последний труд
러시아어문학연구논집
2012 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-309-018824472