메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
현대미술사학회 현대미술사연구 현대미술사연구 제16집
발행연도
2004.12
수록면
227 - 262 (36page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Since its resurgence in the 1960s, public art has extended its definition from 'art in public places', through 'art as public space' to 'art in public interest or new genre public art'. Where once public space was considered to be at the artists' disposal, artists concerns for art-making in the public realm have moved on with these paradigm shifts toward discussing the public's life and its interest in the public realm. A temporary citywide exhibition project 'Culture in Action: New Public Art in Chicago' (which officially ran from May 20 through September 30, 1993), sponsored by the nonprofit public art organization Sculpture Chicago and directed by the independent curator Mary Jane Jacob, emerged as one of the primary examples of such art practices, which mainly focus on community liaisons and collaborative works. Eight artists or artist teams - Mark Dion, Kate Ericson and Mel Ziegler, Simon Grennan and Christopher Sperandio, 'Haha (Richard House, Wendy Jacob, Laurie Palmer, John Ploof)' Suzanne Lacy, Inigo Manglano-Ovalle, Daniel J. Martinez and VinZula Kara, and Robert Peters-were selected to participate in this 'new' public art project. Over a year they created their projects in direct partnership with such specific target communities as high school students, public housing residents, union representatives, HIV/AIDS care volunteers, women's groups, community youths, and local ethnic communities, in addressing specific issues from each community group. This kind of public art practice has been suggested as the alternative to the extant object-based or site-specific public art conventions, and seems to turn the tide in the arena of public art. It is, however, still open to such questions as: why do communities matter?; does it matter where the art is?; what makes the projects effective or successful?, and so forth. Reviewing the 'culture in Action' project, especially Haha's 〈Flood〉 and Manglano-Ovalle's 〈Tele-Vecindario〉, which showed visible evidence for Heartney's long-term effect on the communities' will offer an opportunity to re-consider such questions, as well as the potential to re-discover the value of community and come closer to the long-lasting ideal of art as social intervention. Such processes also serve as the basis for re-framing and re-defining public art in the twenty-first century.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 공공미술의 전개: 미국의 경우
Ⅲ. 공공미술, 또 하나의 접근법: 「행동하는 문화」의 경우
Ⅳ. 방관자에서 참여자로, 그리고 창작의 주체로: ‘하하’와 ‘플러드’의 〈플러드〉와 망글라노-오발과 ‘스트리트-레벨 비디오’의 〈텔레비전 이웃〉
Ⅴ. 나가며: 또 하나의 가능성
참고문헌
Abstract
“공공미술, 또 하나의 접근법 : 「행동하는 문화」 사례를 중심으로”에 대한 질의

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-560-018685267