지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2004.3
- 수록면
- 77 - 110 (34page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
During the late 1960s, there were some significant purges in North Korea. While the one in 1967 was aimed at getting rid of some high-ranking party officials, the one in 1968 was meant to expel some top military officials. Conventional views had emphasized that Kim Il Sung's unlimited ambitions to seize ultimate power had caused these purges. These views, however, have failed to explain that these purges were closely related to shifts in the North Korean political system, which might have been a result of a complex process of policy competition, power struggle, and succession politics. Although some arguments have recently been made that the purges in the late 1960s were the outcome of conflicts on economic and military policies, there is still a lack of sufficient evidence that verify these claims. Therefore, this study seeks to uncover the actual reasons behind these purges.
According to North Korean official documents Park Kum Chol and Lee Hyo Soon are alleged to be "anti-party factionalists," since they have attempted to challenge Kim Il Sung's authority, exert their own authority in their respective fields, be opposed to the state's economic policy, and spread reactionary notions such as feudalism and bourgeois ideas. Surprisingly, they were all purged at the 15th Plenum of the Sixth Party Central Committee in 1967. Their purge was astonishing because they were closely related to Kim Il Sung's anti-Japanese armed struggle, and they had both led the purge of anti-Kim Il Sung forces in August 1958. After a year and a half, Kim Chang Bong, Minister of National Security; and Reo Bong Hak, Commander-in-Chief of the Korean People's Army; were accused and purged for almost the same reasons as the top party officials that had been purged the year before.
These two purges were not caused so much by policy conflicts as they were by the combination of power struggle and policy differences amid succession politics. Kim Jong Il, even though a junior party official at the time, wielded the power to get rid of his revolutionary seniors. By way of these purges, Kim Il Sung proclaimed and established a system of monolithic ideology over the society, and the minimal pluralist traces that remained in the decision-making process were thoroughly eradicated. As a result, the North Korean political system was rapidly transformed into a new one, a sultanistic arrangement in which individual leadership becomes the utmost political norm.
According to North Korean official documents Park Kum Chol and Lee Hyo Soon are alleged to be "anti-party factionalists," since they have attempted to challenge Kim Il Sung's authority, exert their own authority in their respective fields, be opposed to the state's economic policy, and spread reactionary notions such as feudalism and bourgeois ideas. Surprisingly, they were all purged at the 15th Plenum of the Sixth Party Central Committee in 1967. Their purge was astonishing because they were closely related to Kim Il Sung's anti-Japanese armed struggle, and they had both led the purge of anti-Kim Il Sung forces in August 1958. After a year and a half, Kim Chang Bong, Minister of National Security; and Reo Bong Hak, Commander-in-Chief of the Korean People's Army; were accused and purged for almost the same reasons as the top party officials that had been purged the year before.
These two purges were not caused so much by policy conflicts as they were by the combination of power struggle and policy differences amid succession politics. Kim Jong Il, even though a junior party official at the time, wielded the power to get rid of his revolutionary seniors. By way of these purges, Kim Il Sung proclaimed and established a system of monolithic ideology over the society, and the minimal pluralist traces that remained in the decision-making process were thoroughly eradicated. As a result, the North Korean political system was rapidly transformed into a new one, a sultanistic arrangement in which individual leadership becomes the utmost political norm.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. ‘반당 종파분자들’에 대한 공식적 비판
Ⅲ. 숙청과 정치변동
Ⅳ. 술타니즘으로의 이행
Ⅴ. 결론
[참고문헌]
[ABSTRACT]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
권력투쟁의 관점에서 바라본 북한 정치와 숙청 : 권력투쟁 배경 및 유형의 지속과 변화를 중심으로
군사
2017 .09
-
Political Leadership of Kim Il Sung
아세아연구
1977 .07
-
Prospects on Characteristics of the North Korean Succession System and Its Foreign Policy in the Post-Kim Jong Il Era
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2008 .01
-
북한의 후계체제와 김정일 정권 이후 북한의 정치체제 전망
현대북한연구
2010 .12
-
North Korean Political Dynamics of the Kim Jong-un Era
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2016 .01
-
Can the North Korean Regime Survive Kim Jong-Il?
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2008 .01
-
북한 권력승계의 주기(週期) 모델과 북한 체제의 작동원리
국제정치논총
2018 .06
-
Kim Jong Il and North Korea’s Policy toward the U.S.
세계지역연구논총
2008 .01
-
북한군 창설기 당-군관계의 형성과 의미
현대북한연구
2012 .12
-
긴급조치의 청산법리
민주법학
2019 .01
-
역사적 관점에서 살펴 본 북한 『군 엘리트』의 위상 변화 - 당 정치국과 당 중앙위원회를 중심으로 -
군사
2019 .12
-
AN ANALYSIS OF RELIGIOUS FORMS OF JUCHE IDEOLOGY IN COMPARISON WITH CHRISTIANITY
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2002 .01
-
김일성과 김정일의 우상화 정책 비교 연구
국가정책연구
2018 .01
-
THE BASIS OF POWER SUCCESSION OF KIM JONG IL AND POLICY DIRECTIONS
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
1992 .01
-
김정은 정권의 정치적 특성과 대내정책
Journal of North Korea Studies
2018 .01
-
북한의 당군관계 형성과 김일성지도체제의 맹아
통일과 평화
2019 .01
-
Diagnosis and Assessment of North Korea’s Sociocultural Sector in 2012
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2011 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-350-018360805