지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Yi I (1536~1584) is known as one of the most influential scholar-officials of the Chos?n dynasty (1392~1910). The central government witnessed a series of reform programs proposed by Yi in his middle age, but it was in his twenties that he distinguished himself as a scholar. This feature of his 'balanced' career was also well recognized in the intellectual circles of his time and the following Chos?n period as well. Interestingly enough, however, the vast majority of existing studies on Yi highlight his philosophical thought and overlook the importance of his life as a indefatigable reformer. They also tend not to deal with his idea and thought within the historical context of the 500-year dynasty. It is to be regretted that almost all existing studies have approached Yi without the serious consideration of the following questions: What did he want to change and how? Out of his reform proposals, what was eventually accepted later, and what were not? In the course of the adoption of his ideas by later generations, were his proposals revised or not, and if done, to what extent, and why? This paper is designed to provide answers to these questions.
Yi was not successful as a reform-minded official. His programs were not accepted even though none of them was radical. None of his proposals went beyond the boundary of classic Confucian statecraft. He found all of his solutions from the traditional way of statecraft to which his contemporaries were also familiar very well. His reform ideas and programs were indeed based on his insightful knowledge in Confucian statecraft as a scholar as well as his personal experiences as a high-ranking official. For this reason, once his diagnosis and solutions were proved to be accurate and effective, they were often discussed in the royal court generation to generation. With respect to a variety of tribute taxes, in particular, the majority of the reform proposals drawn up were no more than the duplicates of Yi's. Although his original plan was somewhat revised, therefore, the Uniform Land Tax Law (Taedong Law in Korean), which converted the tribute tax collected on a household basis to a land surtax on a landholding basis, was an aggregate product of Yi's original idea, efforts of later-generation officials who admitted of the effective value of his idea, and long-term court debates on this issue.
No thought and policy are free from the situation in which they firsttook shape and were employed. They evolve step by step through debate, adjustment, and trial and error. Yi's reform idea of the tribute tax system was also the case.
Yi was not successful as a reform-minded official. His programs were not accepted even though none of them was radical. None of his proposals went beyond the boundary of classic Confucian statecraft. He found all of his solutions from the traditional way of statecraft to which his contemporaries were also familiar very well. His reform ideas and programs were indeed based on his insightful knowledge in Confucian statecraft as a scholar as well as his personal experiences as a high-ranking official. For this reason, once his diagnosis and solutions were proved to be accurate and effective, they were often discussed in the royal court generation to generation. With respect to a variety of tribute taxes, in particular, the majority of the reform proposals drawn up were no more than the duplicates of Yi's. Although his original plan was somewhat revised, therefore, the Uniform Land Tax Law (Taedong Law in Korean), which converted the tribute tax collected on a household basis to a land surtax on a landholding basis, was an aggregate product of Yi's original idea, efforts of later-generation officials who admitted of the effective value of his idea, and long-term court debates on this issue.
No thought and policy are free from the situation in which they firsttook shape and were employed. They evolve step by step through debate, adjustment, and trial and error. Yi's reform idea of the tribute tax system was also the case.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 이이의 공물ㆍ진상 개혁안의 내용
Ⅲ. 이이의 공물ㆍ진상 개혁안의 영향
Ⅳ. 이이의 공물ㆍ진상 개혁안의 한계
Ⅴ. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
이이의 經世論의 성립과 그 정치적 배경
史叢(사총)
2012 .01
-
조선시대 공물변통론에서 蒲渚趙翼의 위치와 역할
대동문화연구
2010 .01
-
Yi Dynasty and Its Confucian Culture
Korea Journal
1964 .07
-
磻溪 유형원의 대동법인식 : 조선후기 개혁론의 ‘두 가지 입장’대해서
역사학보
2010 .06
-
Yi Dynasty Scholar Painting
Korea Journal
1966 .08
-
대동법을 통해서 본 조선시대 공공성 관념과 현실
역사비평
2011 .02
-
16～17세기 安東 眞城李氏家 墓祭 양상과 儒學的 이념
古文書硏究
2005 .01
-
Women in Yi Dynasty Through Classical Novels
Korea Journal
1974 .01
-
Painting of the Yi Period
Korea Journal
1977 .04
-
莘憩 李敦宇의 生涯와 思想
한국인물사연구
2014 .09
-
Yi Sang and His Works
Korea Journal
1970 .06
-
[Until Yi Dynasty] History of Korean Printing
Korea Journal
1963 .07
-
Western Science in Yi Korea
Korea Journal
1964 .11
-
김육 개혁사상의 연원(淵源)과 성격
한국사학보
2011 .08
-
The Legal Nature of Land Ownership in the Yi Dynasty
Korea Journal
1975 .10
-
이준의 구국운동과 교육사상
기독교교육정보
2007 .12
-
이상정(李象靖)의 『퇴계서절요(退溪書節要)』 편집 방법과 목적
퇴계학논집
2019 .01
-
農巖 金昌協의「四端七情說」에 대한 연구
동양철학연구
2004 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018339432