지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
King Jeongjo's glorifying of Song Si-yeol from inauguration aimed to protect the weak throne soothing audacious Noron(the Older Faction). King Jeongjo ordered that Song Si-yeol's memorial tablet should be layed beside King Hyojong's and memorized forever on May 24, 1776.
However, King Jeongjo's glorifying of Song Si-yeol was not limited in the earlier period of throne. Although we can't see it in Jeongjo-silok(the Annals of King Jeongjo), we can find the fact that King Jeongjo thoughtfully used the glorifying of Song Si-yeol as a useful means to strengthen the throne in Hongjae-jeonseo(the Anthology of King Jeongjo). King Jeongjo used so-called the method of Confucian ideology based on the Song Si-yeol's fame as the highest leveled Neo-Confucian literati to strengthen the throne.
First of all, King Jeongjo emphasized that Song Si-yeol was a model of loyalty to the kingship. King Jeongjo intended that he would make courtiers obey to the kingship depending on the way of Song Si-yeol. We can find King Jeongjo's that intention in the fact that he changed popular valuations about Song Si-yeol. Although people said that Song Si-yeol's studies put the importance on the jik (upright mind), King Jeongjo insisted that Song Si-yeol's studies put the importance on the moral justification and the loyalty to the kingship. We know that the changed valuation of King Jeongjo aimed to strengthen the throne.
King Jeongjo's intentional utterances about Song Si-yeol after 1789 from when King Jeongjo started to strengthen the kingship by himself meant that glorifying of Song Si-yeol was a method to create a new powerful kingship also.
King Jeongjo's endeavor to stress Song Si-yeol was getting more and more as the time passed. And it peaked at the scene that King Jeongjo called Song Si-yeol Chu Hsi after Chu Hsi. The aim of Jeongjo was to emphasize the logic of throne strengthening by the method of Confucian ideology. King Jeongjo yielded a new interpretation that to respect Chu Hsi is to respect kings as well as Chinese Classics and emphasized that Song Si-yeol was something loyal to the king. In the view of respecting Chu Hsi and Chinese classics is respecting the king, Chinese classics became to get reborn with the new meanings. King Jeongjo wanted to notice that the aim of studying Chinese Classics is to be loyal to the kingship through the glorifying of Song Si-yeol.
In the total viewpoint on Song Si-yeol found in the Hongjaejeonseo in several years, we can understand King Jeongjo's glorifying of Song Si-yeol in the later period of his reign was to emphasize the cause of kingship strengthening. King Jeongjo tried to lead men to pay attention to Song Si-yeol by calling him Chu Hsi and wanted to emphasize that the core of Song Si-yeol's studies and the core meaning of Chun-Chu(the Early History of China) aimed to be loyal to the kingship. Now King Jeongjo who prepared the ideological theory for kingship changed his nickname from Hongjae to Mancheon-Myeongwol-juinong. It meant that King himself became a master maneuvering the morality on the world.
However, King Jeongjo's glorifying of Song Si-yeol was not limited in the earlier period of throne. Although we can't see it in Jeongjo-silok(the Annals of King Jeongjo), we can find the fact that King Jeongjo thoughtfully used the glorifying of Song Si-yeol as a useful means to strengthen the throne in Hongjae-jeonseo(the Anthology of King Jeongjo). King Jeongjo used so-called the method of Confucian ideology based on the Song Si-yeol's fame as the highest leveled Neo-Confucian literati to strengthen the throne.
First of all, King Jeongjo emphasized that Song Si-yeol was a model of loyalty to the kingship. King Jeongjo intended that he would make courtiers obey to the kingship depending on the way of Song Si-yeol. We can find King Jeongjo's that intention in the fact that he changed popular valuations about Song Si-yeol. Although people said that Song Si-yeol's studies put the importance on the jik (upright mind), King Jeongjo insisted that Song Si-yeol's studies put the importance on the moral justification and the loyalty to the kingship. We know that the changed valuation of King Jeongjo aimed to strengthen the throne.
King Jeongjo's intentional utterances about Song Si-yeol after 1789 from when King Jeongjo started to strengthen the kingship by himself meant that glorifying of Song Si-yeol was a method to create a new powerful kingship also.
King Jeongjo's endeavor to stress Song Si-yeol was getting more and more as the time passed. And it peaked at the scene that King Jeongjo called Song Si-yeol Chu Hsi after Chu Hsi. The aim of Jeongjo was to emphasize the logic of throne strengthening by the method of Confucian ideology. King Jeongjo yielded a new interpretation that to respect Chu Hsi is to respect kings as well as Chinese Classics and emphasized that Song Si-yeol was something loyal to the king. In the view of respecting Chu Hsi and Chinese classics is respecting the king, Chinese classics became to get reborn with the new meanings. King Jeongjo wanted to notice that the aim of studying Chinese Classics is to be loyal to the kingship through the glorifying of Song Si-yeol.
In the total viewpoint on Song Si-yeol found in the Hongjaejeonseo in several years, we can understand King Jeongjo's glorifying of Song Si-yeol in the later period of his reign was to emphasize the cause of kingship strengthening. King Jeongjo tried to lead men to pay attention to Song Si-yeol by calling him Chu Hsi and wanted to emphasize that the core of Song Si-yeol's studies and the core meaning of Chun-Chu(the Early History of China) aimed to be loyal to the kingship. Now King Jeongjo who prepared the ideological theory for kingship changed his nickname from Hongjae to Mancheon-Myeongwol-juinong. It meant that King himself became a master maneuvering the morality on the world.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 卽位初의 宋時烈 顯彰
Ⅲ. 王權强化를 위한 經學的 方法論
Ⅳ. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
正祖의 先代王 認識과 그 特徵 - 『日得錄』 ｢訓語條｣를 중심으로
온지논총
2009 .01
-
正祖의 更張策과 王權强化論 - 文武兼全論과 實學的 經世觀을 中心으로
동양고전연구
2008 .01
-
어찰의 정치학 : 정조와 심환지
역사비평
2009 .05
-
정조의 俗學 비판과 正學論
한국사연구
2007 .12
-
1990년대 한국사회의 ‘정조신드롬’ 대두와 배경 : 나약한 임금에서 절대계몽군주로의 재탄생
국학연구
2011 .06
-
高宗의 ‘正祖 계승론’에 대한 검토와 試論
인문학연구
2009 .12
-
총론 : 새롭게 보는 정조와 19세기
역사비평
2016 .05
-
정조의 자연·만물관과 공존의 정치
역사비평
2016 .05
-
17세기 사대부의 『주자가례』에 대한인식과 일상에서의 예 실천 : 우암 송시열의 경우를 중심으로
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2006 .06
-
正祖의 士大夫 認識과 그 特徵
동양고전연구
2008 .01
-
正祖의 文章觀에 대한 再考
동방한문학
2014 .01
-
The Construction and Characteristics of Hwaseong Fortress in the Era of King Jeongjo
Korea Journal
2001 .03
-
정조의 대학 이해의 특징
동양철학연구
2020 .01
-
Next of “King”
Localities
2016 .11
-
｢幄對說話｣의 사실성과 의미
동방한문학
2009 .01
-
학문의 자유와 통제 : 이옥의 문체와 정조의 문체반정
한국학연구
2009 .06
-
『리차드 2세』: 왕의 말과 왕의 트라우마, 그리고 왕권
신영어영문학
2013 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018333834