지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
How it was decided to create a copy for the dynasty’s founder King Taejo during the reign of King Sukjong, and how the King’s opinion and the vassals’ opinion regarding the issue differed from each other, are the two things that are examined in this article. And of course, the political meaning of those decisions and views will be analyzed as well.
Since the time of King Injo, the Kings of Joseon continued their efforts of promoting the task of creating a copy for King Taejo’s portrait, but the vassals’ opinion regarding the issue was quite different from that of the Kings, particularly after the time of King Gwanghae-gun, who was dethroned by his own vassals. Yet this situation changed during the reign of King Sukjong, who finally managed to see the task through by emphasizing the fact that a chamber that could house the Taejo’s portrait had already been established in the South extra-structure(Nambyeoljeon: 南別殿), and the fact that former King Hyojong already authorized the task itself. The vassals at the time, remembering the political Gyeongshinyear Hwanguk(庚申換局) incident, decided to honor the King’s decision, but still remained critical to the decision.
The vassals’ position toward this issue was quite different from the position they had maintained toward another issue that took place earlier. Prior to this copy issue, it had been proposed that a posthumous title for King Taejo should be arranged and delivered to the past king(追上), and although some officials were strongly against this proposal, many of the vassals actively supported it and developed a position backing it up, because that proposal came from no other than renowned Song Shi Yeol(宋時烈). The proposal became a policy and was later implemented, and witnessing such events Sukjong came to the conclusion that the vassals were actually considering Song Shi Yeol’s opinion more importantly than that of the King. This issue eventually became one of the catalysts for the political Gisa-year Hwanguk(己巳換局) incident that occurred in the following years, over the issue of establishing the title(定號) for the crown prince candidate(元子).
Since the time of King Injo, the Kings of Joseon continued their efforts of promoting the task of creating a copy for King Taejo’s portrait, but the vassals’ opinion regarding the issue was quite different from that of the Kings, particularly after the time of King Gwanghae-gun, who was dethroned by his own vassals. Yet this situation changed during the reign of King Sukjong, who finally managed to see the task through by emphasizing the fact that a chamber that could house the Taejo’s portrait had already been established in the South extra-structure(Nambyeoljeon: 南別殿), and the fact that former King Hyojong already authorized the task itself. The vassals at the time, remembering the political Gyeongshinyear Hwanguk(庚申換局) incident, decided to honor the King’s decision, but still remained critical to the decision.
The vassals’ position toward this issue was quite different from the position they had maintained toward another issue that took place earlier. Prior to this copy issue, it had been proposed that a posthumous title for King Taejo should be arranged and delivered to the past king(追上), and although some officials were strongly against this proposal, many of the vassals actively supported it and developed a position backing it up, because that proposal came from no other than renowned Song Shi Yeol(宋時烈). The proposal became a policy and was later implemented, and witnessing such events Sukjong came to the conclusion that the vassals were actually considering Song Shi Yeol’s opinion more importantly than that of the King. This issue eventually became one of the catalysts for the political Gisa-year Hwanguk(己巳換局) incident that occurred in the following years, over the issue of establishing the title(定號) for the crown prince candidate(元子).
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 太祖 影幀 模寫의 경위
Ⅲ. 태조 영정 모사를 둘러싼 정계의 인식
Ⅳ. 太祖 影幀 模寫의 정치사적 함의
Ⅴ. 맺음말
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Next of “King”
Localities
2016 .11
-
『리차드 2세』: 왕의 말과 왕의 트라우마, 그리고 왕권
신영어영문학
2013 .11
-
高句麗王號 ‘太祖王’의 정립 과정과 의미
한국사연구
2017 .09
-
朝鮮初期 宗親職制의 정비와 운영
한국사연구
2010 .12
-
조선시대 왕의 이중적 재현 : 인조대를 중심으로
한국학연구
2012 .03
-
고려 전기 정기적 국왕 행사의 내용과 의미
역사와현실
2013 .03
-
<용비어천가>의 六祖 서술 양상 고찰
어문연구
2018 .01
-
숙종대 太祖 諡號의 追上과 政界의 인식- 조선 創業과 威化島回軍에 대한 재평가 -
동방학지
2006 .01
-
The Horak Debate from the Reign of King Sukjong to King Sunjo
Korea Journal
2011 .03
-
17세기, 인∙숙종기(1609년경~1724년경) 미술의 성격
강좌 미술사
2008 .01
-
新羅 哀莊王代의 政治變動과 金彦昇
한국고대사연구
2004 .06
-
Joseon Kings’ Personal Belief in Buddhism and its Political Significance
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2011 .03
-
광해군의 太祖 影幀 모사와 漢陽 眞殿(南別殿) 수립
[TCHCCOS] 향토서울
2013 .10
-
조선시대 국왕호칭의 종류와 의미
역사와경계
2004 .09
-
고구려의 태자 책봉제 수용 과정 고찰
한국사연구
2011 .06
-
正祖의 宋時烈 顯彰과 王權 强化論
한국사연구
2008 .06
-
조선시대 어제시의 창작 양상과 그 의미
장서각
2008 .06
-
고려전기 后妃의 稱外姓 문제
한국사학보
2009 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-018333849