개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2004.12
- 수록면
- 3 - 37 (37page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This Paper examines the political thought of the middle-right wing in the post-liberation age of Korea from the aspect of integration nationalism Integration nationalism means the national movements which pursue national integration as their primary task. And the middle-right wing in the post-liberation age indicates the groups which initiated the left-right wing cooperation movement in 1946-47 and the south-north integration movement in 1947-48. The representative leaders of the middle-right wing were Kim-Kyusik, An-Jaehong, Kim-Goo, Cho-Soang, etc., and the main groups were the Committee for left-right wing cooperation(左右合作委員會), the Minjokjaju-yeonmaing(民族自主聯盟), and the Korean Inderpendence Party(韓國獨立黨) etc..
The middle-right wing thought that the left-right struggle would lead to internal strife and terrible war. So they made grate efforts to integrate the separated political powers and to establish an integrated Korean state. But their task for integration could not be obtained only by crying patriotism and it required alternative theories for national integration and state building. So they searched for a solution to those problems, and presented alternative political ideas and perspectives to integrate the national divide and make a single unified state.
They insisted that an ethnic nation was the permanent substance, and the national community or national common interests were possible beyond individual interests. They pursued world peace on the basis of independence and coexistence of every nation. They excluded class dictatorship and wanted nation-wide welfare. They sought a class-transcending state model with the harmony of individual liberty and planned economy. Their tendency for socio-economic policies had many points of likeness to democratic socialism of western political history. They denied terrorism and called for the moral of compromise and concession. They pursued national independence and hated depending on foreign powers. They rejected dogmatism and formalism, and emphasized propriety and flexibility in policy selection. Their alternatives could be summarized by the slogan of 'Korean democracy,' the most suitable political system for Choseon.
The political thought of the middle-right wing is one of the most excellent and unique parts in Korean political history. Their ideas and practices are pioneering works in the third world's ideological exploration for an ethno-centric development model. Of course their ideas and hopes were not achieved, but their case shows us that Korean nationalism was not narrow-minded.
The middle-right wing thought that the left-right struggle would lead to internal strife and terrible war. So they made grate efforts to integrate the separated political powers and to establish an integrated Korean state. But their task for integration could not be obtained only by crying patriotism and it required alternative theories for national integration and state building. So they searched for a solution to those problems, and presented alternative political ideas and perspectives to integrate the national divide and make a single unified state.
They insisted that an ethnic nation was the permanent substance, and the national community or national common interests were possible beyond individual interests. They pursued world peace on the basis of independence and coexistence of every nation. They excluded class dictatorship and wanted nation-wide welfare. They sought a class-transcending state model with the harmony of individual liberty and planned economy. Their tendency for socio-economic policies had many points of likeness to democratic socialism of western political history. They denied terrorism and called for the moral of compromise and concession. They pursued national independence and hated depending on foreign powers. They rejected dogmatism and formalism, and emphasized propriety and flexibility in policy selection. Their alternatives could be summarized by the slogan of 'Korean democracy,' the most suitable political system for Choseon.
The political thought of the middle-right wing is one of the most excellent and unique parts in Korean political history. Their ideas and practices are pioneering works in the third world's ideological exploration for an ethno-centric development model. Of course their ideas and hopes were not achieved, but their case shows us that Korean nationalism was not narrow-minded.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 해방 후의 통일운동과 중도우파
Ⅲ. 민족가치의 최고성
Ⅳ. 초계급적 통일민족국가론
Ⅴ. 화합ㆍ공존의 정치윤리와 민족자주론
Ⅵ. 중도우파 사상의 성격과 의의
Ⅶ. 맺음말
참고문헌
English Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Political Thought behind Korean National
Korea Journal
1976 .04
-
안재홍의 민족통일노선과 신민족주의
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2004 .12
-
정치민족주의와 문화민족주의
프랑스사 연구
2017 .08
-
민족통일운동의 제4국면 : '한민족공동체학' 서설
고조선단군학
2005 .12
-
통일민족주의의 좌절 : 해방공간에서의 민족통일운동의 실패, 그 과정과 원인 및 결과
고조선단군학
2017 .12
-
한국 민족주의에 대한 다양한 해석의 가능성 : 종족민족주의와 정치적 민족주의의 접합
인간·환경·미래
2010 .04
-
안재홍의 근대 민족주의론 비판과 신민족주의
한국학논집
2014 .03
-
백범 김구의 민족주의사상과 세계화시대의 민족주의
한국시민윤리학회보
2011 .01
-
20세기 전반 한국 사상계의 궤적과 민족주의 담론
한국사연구
2010 .09
-
한국 민족주의 연구의 쟁점과 과제
민족연구
2019 .01
-
분단체제 극복과제와 민족주의
고조선단군학
2019 .12
-
3·1운동 연구의 흐름과 민족주의의 향방
사학연구
2020 .09
-
한국독립운동과 독립국가 건설의 역사적 의미
한국독립운동사연구
2006 .06
-
역사 사료적으로 살펴본 3·1운동 관련 ‘문헌’
신학지남
2019 .03
-
The Failure of the Political Movements of Korean Working Class
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
1998 .09
-
Political Thought in Korea
Korea Journal
1978 .10
-
민족통일운동과 ‘단군민족주의’
고조선단군학
2004 .12
-
중심을 향한 독일의 근대적 열정과 그 통합이념체계들 : 종족적 민족주의, 헌법애국주의/탈민족적 민주주의, 다문화주의
역사학보
2008 .12
-
Problems of Korean Nationalism
Korea Journal
1966 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-151-002098509