지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2005.9
- 수록면
- 121 - 145 (27page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper studied the course of the application of Japanese Civil law in domestic relations; i. e. marriageable age, divorce system, adopted son system, and the dissolution of adoption system. Particularly, it examined operating aspects of customary law previous to the application of Japanese Civil law in terms of these four items by revision of the Choseon Civil Code (1922, 1939).
As a result of that, the Government-General of Choseon was re-inventing Choseon’s customs through the following three forms. And the source inventing Choseon’s custom was in Japanese Civil law. In detail, first concerns marriageable age. The Government-General of Choseon prevented the early marriage custom of Choseon people by disciplinary action and did not enter them as a married couple in the family register.
Secondly, the problem whether a son by concubine would be approved for the right of succession to the family was regulated through the announcement of an administrative note. Namely administrative power exerted influence upon a court’s decision Thus, customs were induced to pursue the stability of the state.
The third type was about the divorce system and the dissolution of adoption system The Government-General of Choseon enforced the divorce system and the dissolution of adoption system under Japanese Civil Law from the beginning of Korean Annexation. New usages in relations to a divorce and a dissolution of adoption occurred according to the institutionalization of those therein.
Judged by these historical facts, the Government-General of Choseon guided redefining Choseon’s customs towards the direction of Japanese Civil Law. And then these customs was settled down to some degree in Colonial Korea. After that, these items directly became the subjects of application of Japanese Civil Law. In short, customary law was a strategy that was introduced to invent customs under Japanese Civil Law and simultaneously to soften a shock that would have occurred under the direct application of Japanese Civil Law.
As a result of that, the Government-General of Choseon was re-inventing Choseon’s customs through the following three forms. And the source inventing Choseon’s custom was in Japanese Civil law. In detail, first concerns marriageable age. The Government-General of Choseon prevented the early marriage custom of Choseon people by disciplinary action and did not enter them as a married couple in the family register.
Secondly, the problem whether a son by concubine would be approved for the right of succession to the family was regulated through the announcement of an administrative note. Namely administrative power exerted influence upon a court’s decision Thus, customs were induced to pursue the stability of the state.
The third type was about the divorce system and the dissolution of adoption system The Government-General of Choseon enforced the divorce system and the dissolution of adoption system under Japanese Civil Law from the beginning of Korean Annexation. New usages in relations to a divorce and a dissolution of adoption occurred according to the institutionalization of those therein.
Judged by these historical facts, the Government-General of Choseon guided redefining Choseon’s customs towards the direction of Japanese Civil Law. And then these customs was settled down to some degree in Colonial Korea. After that, these items directly became the subjects of application of Japanese Civil Law. In short, customary law was a strategy that was introduced to invent customs under Japanese Civil Law and simultaneously to soften a shock that would have occurred under the direct application of Japanese Civil Law.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 親族慣習의 民法 依用 過程
Ⅲ. 결론
참고문헌
English Abstract
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
植民地時期 親族ㆍ相續 慣習法 政策 : 朝鮮民事令 제11조‘慣習’의 植民地 政治性을 중심으로
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2006 .09
-
Civil Law and Korean Family System
Korea Journal
1963 .10
-
日本における2018年改正相続法に関する考察
日本學硏究
2019 .01
-
오다 미키지로(小田幹治郞)의 한국 관습조사와 관습법 정책
한국민족문화
2013 .02
-
1910·20년대 조선총독부의 법제정책 -조선민사령 제11조 '관습'의 成文化를 중심으로-
동방학지
2004 .01
-
개항기 일본어민의 조선어장 침탈과 러·일간의 각축
대구사학
2011 .01
-
조선시대와 일제시대 여성의 법적 지위 비교
역사와 담론
2003 .12
-
해방 직후 재일한인 문단과 ‘일본어’ 창작문제 - 朝鮮文藝를 중심으로
한국문학논총
2006 .01
-
조선후기사의 연구 경향
역사학보
2008 .09
-
中國傳統社會의 民事法發展過程에 대한 一檢討
중국사연구
2007 .01
-
식민지기 새로운 지식체계로서 ‘조선사’‧‘조선문학’‧‘동양철학’의 형성과 고등교육
동방학지
2012 .01
-
다카하마 교시의 『조선』 론* ─교정되는 텍스트를 중심으로─
日本學硏究
2016 .01
-
1910년대 총독부의 조선 문화재 조사 사업에 관하여
역사와경계
2008 .12
-
일제의 관습조사사업과 식민지 '관습법'의 성격
역사민속학
2003 .12
-
Korean - Japanese Relations, 1894-1904 (Ⅰ)
Korea Journal
1981 .02
-
Korean-Japanese Relations, 1894-1904(Ⅱ)
Korea Journal
1981 .03
-
고대 아테네의 법원(法源)과 법 실현의 주체
대구사학
2009 .01
-
조선시대 증광시 문과에 관한 몇 가지 검토
국학연구
2018 .07
-
조선총독부의 조선인 이름 정책과 이름의 변화 양상들
역사민속학
2015 .11
-
일제의 동아시아 구관조사와 식민지 법 제정 구상 : 대만과 조선의 구관입법을 중심으로
한국사연구
2010 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-151-001726600