메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한직업환경의학회 대한직업환경의학회지 대한산업의학회지 제18권 제4호
발행연도
2006.12
수록면
272 - 283 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Objectives: This study was performed to examine the health status measured by SF-36 and medical facilities utilization according to the health status measured by SF-36 in male workers.
Methods: A self-administered questionnaire survey was administered to 786 male workers.
Results: In bivariate analysis, physical functioning score was significantly different among the workers according to age, educational level, economic level, and job type. The bodily pain score and general health score were significantly different according to the workers’economic level and job type. The vitality score was significantly different according to the workers’age, educational level, economic level, and job type. The social functioning score was significantly different according to the workers’ age, marital status, economic level, and job type. The role limitation emotion score was significantly different according to the workers’age, marital status, and job type. The mental health score was significantly different according to the workers’marital status, economic level, and job type (p<0.05).
The SF-36 scores increased with higher workers’self-rated health status (p<0.05).
The self-rated current health status of the workers was good when their economic status was high, their previous year health status was good and their SF-36 score was high (p<0.05).
The rates of morbidity incidence and medical facilities utilization for 1 year were lower when workers’ SF-36 score was high (p<0.05).
Conclusions: In consideration of the above findings, SF-36 is suitable to measure health status and predict the medical utilization.

목차

Abstract
서론
대상 및 방법
성적
고찰
요약 및 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-517-019538388