지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to examine approaches to the structure of cleft sentences in English such as the extrapositional approach, the expletive approach, the constructional approach, and the Role and Reference Grammar approach, and investigate the natures of the four components of cleft sentences.
The extrapositional approach focuses on the copular nature of cleft sentences, treats the cleft clause as being related to, or modifying, the cleft pronoun. Together these form a semantic unit and the clefted constituent is identified with this unit through the use of the copula.
Under the expletive approach, the cleft pronoun and the copula are relegated to being expletive, dummy, semantically inert elements, while the cleft cleft clause bears a semantic relation to the clefted constituent.
The constructional approach interprets cleft sentences as a combination of two coded relationships which are part of the constructions themselves. First, the relationship between the cleft clause and its antecedent, the clefted constituent, constitutes a 'value-variable' relation, rather than head-modifier as in restrictive relative clause. This approach proposes that there is a second identifying semantic relation within the copular matrix clause. The cleft pronoun performs a quantificational role and is equated via the copula with the clefted constituent.
Under the Role and Reference Grammar approach, there are syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic similarities between restrictive relatives and it-cleft constructions but there are some differences. The function of a cleft construction is a combination of the relative clause relationship and the information structure properties of the copular matrix clause. The clef ted clause is peripheral to the matrix clause, however, rather than the clefted constituent. The relationship between the cleft clause and the clefted constituent is not as a modifier of a nominal head but as a clause containing a variable for which the referential clefted constituent provides the value. The content of the pragmatic presupposition of cleft sentences is not to be found solely in the semantic content of the cleft clause without reference to the clef ted constituent.
The natures of each component of a cleft sentence are different depending on the approaches to cleft sentences.
In conclusion, various kinds of the previous approaches to cleft sentences have their own advantages and disadvantages. However, it is estimated that the Role and Reference Grammar approach, which analyzes cleft sentences by combining syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic aspects, is the most persuasive one among them. by combing syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic approaches. But further research in cleft sentences seems to be needed.
The extrapositional approach focuses on the copular nature of cleft sentences, treats the cleft clause as being related to, or modifying, the cleft pronoun. Together these form a semantic unit and the clefted constituent is identified with this unit through the use of the copula.
Under the expletive approach, the cleft pronoun and the copula are relegated to being expletive, dummy, semantically inert elements, while the cleft cleft clause bears a semantic relation to the clefted constituent.
The constructional approach interprets cleft sentences as a combination of two coded relationships which are part of the constructions themselves. First, the relationship between the cleft clause and its antecedent, the clefted constituent, constitutes a 'value-variable' relation, rather than head-modifier as in restrictive relative clause. This approach proposes that there is a second identifying semantic relation within the copular matrix clause. The cleft pronoun performs a quantificational role and is equated via the copula with the clefted constituent.
Under the Role and Reference Grammar approach, there are syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic similarities between restrictive relatives and it-cleft constructions but there are some differences. The function of a cleft construction is a combination of the relative clause relationship and the information structure properties of the copular matrix clause. The clef ted clause is peripheral to the matrix clause, however, rather than the clefted constituent. The relationship between the cleft clause and the clefted constituent is not as a modifier of a nominal head but as a clause containing a variable for which the referential clefted constituent provides the value. The content of the pragmatic presupposition of cleft sentences is not to be found solely in the semantic content of the cleft clause without reference to the clef ted constituent.
The natures of each component of a cleft sentence are different depending on the approaches to cleft sentences.
In conclusion, various kinds of the previous approaches to cleft sentences have their own advantages and disadvantages. However, it is estimated that the Role and Reference Grammar approach, which analyzes cleft sentences by combining syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic aspects, is the most persuasive one among them. by combing syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic approaches. But further research in cleft sentences seems to be needed.
목차
1. 서론
2. 분열문 구조에 대한 접근방법
3. 분열문 구성요소
4. 요약 및 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
영어 It-분열문의 분열성분에 따른 정보구조와 담화기능
언어과학
2009 .01
-
비제한적 관계절로서의 영어 It-분열문
생성문법연구
2018 .01
-
The Syntax and Semantics of It-clefts
생성문법연구
2013 .01
-
영어 Wh-분열문의 정보구조와 담화기능 : 코퍼스 자료 분석을 중심으로
언어과학연구
2019 .03
-
Humanness Restriction in English Pseudo-clefts
영어영문학연구
2016 .01
-
A Contextual Analysis of IT-Clefts and WH-Clefts in English Discourse
언어
1997 .06
-
현대중국어 분열문 및 준분열문
외국학연구
2019 .01
-
관형사절이 단언을 나타내는 열린 분열문에 대하여
언어사실과 관점
2017 .01
-
Wh-분할구조와 it-분할구조의 분포와 기능에 관한 연구
영어영문학연구
2004 .01
-
영어 it 분열구문에 대한 RRG 분석
언어과학
2013 .01
-
On the Categorial Restriction of Clefted XPs in English
영어학
2019 .09
-
Subject - less Clefts in Korean : Towards a Deletion Analysis
어학연구
2001 .12
-
English Cleft Constructions: Corpus Findings and Theoretical Implications
생성문법연구
2007 .01
-
An Analysis of But/Other Than-Correlatives as ‘But/Than’ Clefts
어학연구
2005 .12
-
현대중국어 준분열문 ‘S+VP+的是+NP’ 격식 연구
중국어문학논집
2019 .08
-
Cleft Sources for the Sluice and Identity in Ellipsis
언어
2015 .03
-
What Sluicing Comes from in Korean is Pseudo-cleft
언어
2012 .03
-
It-Cleft Dependency : Strong or Weak?
언어
2003 .06
-
분열문의 의미와 초점 후치사의 수의성
어학연구
2015 .12
-
Truncated Clefts are Ambiguous
언어
2010 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-705-001706440