지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There are many reasons that transparency is emphasized in the Government Procurement, but they can be summarized into four points. 1) Enhancing economic efficiency, 2) Achieving Anti-corruption, 3) Protecting the contractor, and 4) Enhancing accessibility to market (Non-Discrimination). They can also be understood as four major goals of transparency in Government Procurement Contract. Among these points, enhancing accessibility to market is gaining more importance recently under the WTO government procurement regime.
When analyzing the Government Procurement in light of transparency, four aspects need to be considered: 1) Information disclosure, 2) Limitation on Discretion, 3) Provisions on verification and enforcement, and 4) Extent of application of the rules concerning transparency.
When looking at these four aspects in other developed countries or WTO, it is commendable that enhancement of accessibility to market strengthens transparency in collaboration with three other goals. However, too much emphasis on enhancing accessibility to market can end up protecting the "contracter" only. Hence, it is important to find an equilibrium between public agencies and the contractor.
In this respect, each goal of transparency needs to be analyzed separately. Firstly, concerning the economic efficiency, the extent of information disclosure should be determined considering the balance between the public agencies' efficiency and that of the contractor.
Secondly, in regard to the anti-corruption, it is crucial to strengthen judicial review to control the discretionary power to prevent corruption of public agencies. Meanwhile, penal sanction and debarring should be actively implemented to curb corruption of contractor.
Thirdly, concerning the protection of contractor, it is very important to put review system in place. To this end, more conflicts that arise from the government procurement contract should be subject to administrative litigation, and more provisions should be interpreted as imperative.
In regard to the non-discrimination, the distinction between the international bidding and internal bidding should be abolished gradually. However, the discretionary power of public agencies should have more room for internal bidding.
When analyzing the Government Procurement in light of transparency, four aspects need to be considered: 1) Information disclosure, 2) Limitation on Discretion, 3) Provisions on verification and enforcement, and 4) Extent of application of the rules concerning transparency.
When looking at these four aspects in other developed countries or WTO, it is commendable that enhancement of accessibility to market strengthens transparency in collaboration with three other goals. However, too much emphasis on enhancing accessibility to market can end up protecting the "contracter" only. Hence, it is important to find an equilibrium between public agencies and the contractor.
In this respect, each goal of transparency needs to be analyzed separately. Firstly, concerning the economic efficiency, the extent of information disclosure should be determined considering the balance between the public agencies' efficiency and that of the contractor.
Secondly, in regard to the anti-corruption, it is crucial to strengthen judicial review to control the discretionary power to prevent corruption of public agencies. Meanwhile, penal sanction and debarring should be actively implemented to curb corruption of contractor.
Thirdly, concerning the protection of contractor, it is very important to put review system in place. To this end, more conflicts that arise from the government procurement contract should be subject to administrative litigation, and more provisions should be interpreted as imperative.
In regard to the non-discrimination, the distinction between the international bidding and internal bidding should be abolished gradually. However, the discretionary power of public agencies should have more room for internal bidding.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론 - 투명성의 목표는 무엇인가
Ⅱ. 비교법적 분석
Ⅲ. 우리나라 법제현황과 개선방안
Ⅳ. 결론
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
재정행정법과 국제경제법의 상관관계에서 본 정부조달계약
행정법연구
2007 .05
-
Transparency and Fight against Public Procurement Corruption in Nigeria: A Perspective on the Public Procurement Act, 2007
Asian Journal of African Studies
2020 .02
-
분권화시대의 지방정부 조달시스템 효율화 방안
경기연구원 기본연구
2011 .12
-
지방계약법상 부정당업자입찰참가자격제한 제도의 개선방안에 관한 硏究- 실무운용과정에서의 제도적 미비를 보완하기 위한입법론적 방안을 중심으로 -
지방자치법연구
2011 .01
-
WTO 정부조달제도(GPA)로부터 바라본 중국 정부조달제도의 문제점과 입법과제
경영법률
2013 .01
-
A Study on the Effect of Market Opening and Government Transparency on Corruption in Myanmar
한국무역학회 국제학술대회
2017 .07
-
투명성 가치 : 개념적 구조와 의미
한국사회와 행정연구
2001 .11
-
한국기업의 해외정부조달분야 수출증대방안에 관한 연구
통상정보연구
2010 .06
-
미국의 주(州) 및 지방정부 계약법제에 대한 연구
지방자치법연구
2018 .01
-
전자정부와 부패의 관계에 관한 실증연구 : 정책결정 투명성을 중심으로
한국지역정보화학회지
2014 .06
-
국가종합전자조달(GePS) 시스템에 관한 소고 : 조달관련 법령 및 제도 개선사항을 중심으로
강원법학
2002 .11
-
AN EXPLORATORY APPROACH ON PUBLIC E-PROCUREMENT IN CHINA BASED ON KOREAN SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION
한국로고스경영학회 학술발표대회논문집
2007 .07
-
AN EXPLORATORY APPROACH ON PUBLIC E-PROCUREMENT SYSTEM IN CHINA BASED ON KOREAN SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION
한국로고스경영학회 학술발표대회논문집
2007 .07
-
A Mechanism to Derive Optimal Contractor-type & Action Combinations of a Single-source Procurement Contract
한국경영과학회지
1999 .06
-
한·중 FTA 관련 중국 정부조달시장 개방에 관한 중국정부조달법(政府采構法) 연구 및 대응방안 모색
중앙법학
2012 .09
-
헌법적 문제로서 한국 정부조달제도의 몇 가지 이슈
저스티스
2019 .02
-
국제조달시장의 전자무역 구현에 관한 연구
통상정보연구
2004 .12
-
지역발전을 위한 지방계약법제와 민간투자법제의 정비방안
지방자치법연구
2009 .01
-
행정조달계약의 법적 성격 재조명에 따른 입법적 통제 방안 : 주계약자 관리 방식을 중심으로
공법학연구
2018 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
멀티클라우드 환경에서 사용자에게 서비스의 투명성을 제공하는 인증 기법
이재경
,
손정갑
,
김훈민
외 1명
정보보호학회논문지
2013
.12
경제와 관료 : 박근혜 정부의 경제 성장정책, 다시 국가주도인가
유철규
황해문화
2013
.06
박근혜 정부의 성공을 위한 고언
오태규
,
김형오
,
최상연
외 6명
관훈저널
2013
.03
온라인상의 개인 정보 제공에 있어서의 정보 투명성의 역할
이동주
,
방영석
,
배윤수
외 1명
대한경영학회 학술발표대회 발표논문집
2010
.04
공공조달계약 관련법제의 개혁에 대한 고찰 : 국가계약법을 중심으로
김대인
강원법학
2009
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0