지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Korean Antimonopoly Act(the Act) prohibits unfair internal dealings with persons having special relationship, typically family members, as well as affiliate companies. The legislative intent is to prevent unfair subsidizing in large business groups which gives unfair competitive advantages to affiliate companies or to maintain, through persons having special relationship, concentrated economic power of large business groups.
The recent Supreme Court decision frustrated the legislative intent by reversing an administrative decision by the Korean Fair Trade Commission(the competition law enforcement agency). In 1999, KFTC invoked sanctions against abnormally advantageous massive transfers of bonds with warrant(BW) issued by an affiliated company of the largest business group in Korea to persons having special relationship with the Group′s largest shareholder and leader in fact. In reversing the administrative decision, the Court required proving its direct and specific negative effect on transferees′ markets or concentration of economic power by the group for holding illegal internal dealings with persons having special relationship.
The Court took a too narrow approach as to the ?unfairness′ of internal dealings with persons having special relationship considering the characteristics of internal dealings as well as the legislative intent of the relevant provisions. In view of legislative history of the Act and comparable provisions of foreign competition laws, it is fairly inferred that the Act did not intended such a narrow approach in introducing the prohibition of unfair internal dealings. Moreover, internal dealings with persons having special relationship cannot by themselves have any direct and imminent anticompetitive or economic power concentrating effect. They have, by their nature, negative effect, indirectly and through a long period of time, on markets the affiliate companies run business or on the concentration of large business groups which the subsidized persons have special relationship with.
The recent Supreme Court decision frustrated the legislative intent by reversing an administrative decision by the Korean Fair Trade Commission(the competition law enforcement agency). In 1999, KFTC invoked sanctions against abnormally advantageous massive transfers of bonds with warrant(BW) issued by an affiliated company of the largest business group in Korea to persons having special relationship with the Group′s largest shareholder and leader in fact. In reversing the administrative decision, the Court required proving its direct and specific negative effect on transferees′ markets or concentration of economic power by the group for holding illegal internal dealings with persons having special relationship.
The Court took a too narrow approach as to the ?unfairness′ of internal dealings with persons having special relationship considering the characteristics of internal dealings as well as the legislative intent of the relevant provisions. In view of legislative history of the Act and comparable provisions of foreign competition laws, it is fairly inferred that the Act did not intended such a narrow approach in introducing the prohibition of unfair internal dealings. Moreover, internal dealings with persons having special relationship cannot by themselves have any direct and imminent anticompetitive or economic power concentrating effect. They have, by their nature, negative effect, indirectly and through a long period of time, on markets the affiliate companies run business or on the concentration of large business groups which the subsidized persons have special relationship with.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 사안의 개요 및 원심판결의 내용
Ⅲ. 대상판결의 내용
Ⅳ. 부당지원행위금지 조항의 입법취지
Ⅴ. 특수관계인에 대한 지원행위의 부당성 판단
Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
부정경쟁행위에 대한 손해배상책임 법리의 고찰
한양법학
2013 .05
-
공정거래법상 부당한 지원행위의 위법성 판단 기준
원광법학
2013 .01
-
독점규제법상 부당지원행위규제에 관한 소고
재산법연구
2012 .01
-
저작권법에 의한 보호가 부정되는 경우 부정경쟁방지 및 영업비밀보호에 관한 법률 제2조 제1호 (차)목의 적용범위
한양법학
2018 .02
-
공정거래법상 불공정거래행위의 위법성 판단기준에 대한 재검토 -경쟁질서와의 관련성을 중심으로
경쟁법연구
2018 .01
-
미국회사법상의 이사의 자기거래
비교사법
2004 .12
-
소비자거래법의 제정 방향
정책연구보고서
2013 .12
-
기업내부통제제도의 바람직한 입법방향
기업법연구
2011 .12
-
부당행위계산부인의 특수관계인 범위에 관한 고찰
法學論文集
2014 .01
-
고령화시대 노인 연령규범에 대한 현행 법제적 고찰
법과 정책연구
2010 .01
-
대기업의 일감몰아주기 규제 관련 법률의 개선방향
한양법학
2014 .05
-
이해상충방지를 위한 내부통제시스템에 관한 연구 : 자본시장법을 중심으로
기업법연구
2010 .09
-
법률위반과 부정경쟁행위
지식재산연구
2013 .03
-
중국 부정경쟁방지법상 인터넷 부정경쟁행위 관련 규정 검토
민사법의 이론과 실무
2019 .01
-
「장애인 등에 대한 특수교육법」제정 이후에 나타나고 있는 특수교육의 변화 - 특수학교를 중심으로 -
특수아동교육연구
2009 .01
-
자본시장법상 불공정거래행위의 규제와 제재수단에 관한 연구
일감법학
2013 .01
-
산재법상 특수형태근로종사자 개념의 비판적 이해
노동법학
2016 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0