메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
고려대학교 아세아문제연구원 아세아연구 아세아연구 통권 135호
발행연도
2009.3
수록면
240 - 286 (49page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Since the 1970s American politics has become increasingly polarized along partisan and ideological lines. Until recently, this polarization has been widely debated mainly in the area of domestic economic and social policymaking. Shapiro and Bloch-Elkon (2007), found that partisan and ostensibly ideological conflict have been a visible characteristic of foreign policy debates as well, suggesting a major change in the nature of American politics. This paper examines surveys conducted from the 1990’s until the present by different organizations, to see the extent to which, if any, the American public’s as well as leaders’ opinions on U.S foreign policy issues towards East Asian countries (South Korea, North Korea, China and Japan), have also become more polarized along Democratic-Republican partisan and ideological lines. It finds that for the most part the opinions toward East Asian countries have not been heavily embroiled in the ongoing partisan conflict. North Korea, from 2004 onward because of its growing nuclear capability, has been seen as a threat by all segments of the American public. This development and the otherwise low salience of U.S.-East Asian relations compared to other areas of American foreign policy, affected how the public thought about this region in partisan and ideological terms.

목차

Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Partisan and Ideological Polarization
Ⅲ. Research and Data
Ⅳ. Analysis and Findings
Ⅴ. Conclusions
References
Appendix - Survey Questions
Abstract

참고문헌 (56)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0