지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2008.10
- 수록면
- 259 - 277 (19page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Traditional familism and family value is known as the value that most Koreans share with. Strong family solidarity and family-centered perception among Koreans influences other social values and ideology. Under the family value, caring for family members is family responsibility instead of government responsibility. Previous studies argued that the family value played a role to impede the development of family policy in Korea. The aim of this study was to explore a relation between the family value and the needs for care-support family policy. This study investigated how the family value were related to the specific needs for care-support family policy. The data were drawn from the Seoul Families Survey conducted on 2006 by Seoul Women and Family Foundation. The survey data consisted of 2,500 married males and females living in Seoul. The statistical techniques used for analysis were frequencies, means, t-test, ANDVA, crosstabs, multiple regression models, and multinomial logit models. The major findings of this study were as followings.
First, while the traditional familism appeared to be held at a certain level, the general attitudes towards cohabitation, divorce, and single-parent family seemed to be less traditional.
Second, the familism was found to be partly associated with the needs for the care-support family policy. The respondents who had less traditional value on arriage and child-rearing showed the higher level of needs for daycare center. This finding implied that nontraditional attitudes were related to the needs for an alternative care service such as caring through facilities rather than to the needs for supportive or complementary services.
Lastly, the respondents who had higher level of traditional familism showed a higher preference for direct economic service (supportive service) than for other types of service in child care. And the less traditional their attitudes towards marriage and child-rearing, the more likely they are to prefer flexible child care services and programs to other types of child care services.
These results implied that the family value was partly influential to family policy. However, it is worthy to note that the family value was related to family policy preference rather than to family policy needs. In other words, traditional family value appeared to influence the types of family policy rather than the level of needs for family policy.
First, while the traditional familism appeared to be held at a certain level, the general attitudes towards cohabitation, divorce, and single-parent family seemed to be less traditional.
Second, the familism was found to be partly associated with the needs for the care-support family policy. The respondents who had less traditional value on arriage and child-rearing showed the higher level of needs for daycare center. This finding implied that nontraditional attitudes were related to the needs for an alternative care service such as caring through facilities rather than to the needs for supportive or complementary services.
Lastly, the respondents who had higher level of traditional familism showed a higher preference for direct economic service (supportive service) than for other types of service in child care. And the less traditional their attitudes towards marriage and child-rearing, the more likely they are to prefer flexible child care services and programs to other types of child care services.
These results implied that the family value was partly influential to family policy. However, it is worthy to note that the family value was related to family policy preference rather than to family policy needs. In other words, traditional family value appeared to influence the types of family policy rather than the level of needs for family policy.
목차
〈Abstract〉
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 선행연구 고찰
Ⅲ. 연구문제 및 조작적 정의
Ⅳ. 연구방법
Ⅴ. 연구결과 및 해석
Ⅵ. 결론 및 논의
【참고문헌】
참고문헌 (86)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국 가족의 전환기적 특성과 가족정책
가정과삶의질연구
2012 .12
-
가정정책 방향 모색을 위한 전문가 조사 연구 : 통합적 가정정책 관점을 중심으로
가정과삶의질연구
2008 .12
-
한국 가족의 전망 및 발전적 모델
한국지역사회생활과학회지
1994 .04
-
[Work-Family Policy and Family Friendly Society] Care Work, Gender Roles and Family Policies between Social Reproduction and the Market : The Case of Germany
가정과삶의질학회 학술발표대회 자료집
2011 .05
-
건강가정기본법의 실천을 위한 정책적 지원
가정과삶의질연구
2004 .10
-
남녀대학생의 가족개념, 가족주의가치관이 가족건장성에 미치는 영향
한국생활과학회지
2010 .06
-
저출산 대책의 가족영향평가 연구
가정과삶의질연구
2006 .12
-
건강가족을 위한 한국가족정책 패러다임의 전환 : 건강가정기본법과 건강가정지원센터를 중심으로
가정과삶의질연구
2008 .08
-
[Family Problems and Counseling] What is Happening to Japanese Families Today : Recent Family Changes and Family Problems in Japan
가정과삶의질학회 학술발표대회 자료집
2011 .05
-
한국가족복지정책에서의 여성정체성
대한가정학회지
2003 .01
-
한국가족문제의 해결을위한 가족치료서비스의 활성화 방안
대한가정학회지
1997 .01
-
육아지원정책에 따른 가정보육시설의 운영방향
한국지역사회생활과학회지
2006 .03
-
중년 기혼 남녀의 전통 가족 의례와 제도에 대한 인식을 통해서 본 현대 한국 가족의 변화
가정과삶의질연구
2012 .12
-
기혼여성의 원가족 경험의 유형화와 가족건강성과의 관계 : 가족분화와 가족규칙을 중심으로
한국생활과학회지
2012 .04
-
[Work-Family Policy and Family Friendly Society] Family-Friendly Policy and the Role of Family-Friendly Support Center in Korea
가정과삶의질학회 학술발표대회 자료집
2011 .05
-
가족여가 활성화를 위한 정책방안
가정과삶의질연구
2009 .09
-
한국 가족 및 친족 개념에 대한 연구 : 가족관련 법을 중심으로
대한가정학회지
2009 .01
-
월남이산가족의 가족주의와 사회적 지원망
대한가정학회지
1993 .01
-
[Diagnosis and Prospectives of Korean Families] The Second National Survey of Korean Families : An Integrative Investigation of Families and Family Life in Korea
가정과삶의질학회 학술발표대회 자료집
2011 .05
-
가족친화적 정책을 통한 일-가족 균형에 관한 연구
가정과삶의질연구
2004 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
돌봄노동의 제도화와 여성들의 차이
이숙진
페미니즘 연구
2011
.10
아동 및 노인 돌봄 정책에 나타난 제도적 가족주의
이재림
가정과삶의질학회 학술발표대회 자료집
2015
.05
영유아 자녀를 둔 여성의 양육 형태 선택에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구 : 주관적 인식과 객관적 환경의 영향
김영미
,
류연규
한국영유아보육학
2014
.11
대학생의 가족주의 가치와 아동기 양육경험에 따른 부모 부양의식 및 피부양기대
김영주
,
공인숙
,
이주리
외 2명
한국생활과학회지
2004
.10
노인돌봄서비스 사업 : 노인돌봄 기본서비스를 중심으로
정진주
서울시 여성가족재단 연구사업보고서
2011
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0