메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국영어학회 영어학 영어학 Volume.7 Number.2
발행연도
2007.6
수록면
287 - 309 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Kemenade (1997a, b) and Fischer et al. (2000) argued that topicalization of non-subjects in negative sentences with ne was extremely rare in Old English (OE) but became more frequent in Middle English (ME). They presented this as evidence that preverbal ne in OE functioned as a topic and by early ME ne was weakening and gradually lost its constituent status. By examining the OE prose texts Cura Pastoralis (CP) and Homilies of Ælfric (ÆcHom), this paper first shows that OE topic-initial negative sentences possessed the same syntactic structures as ME ones. The paper moreover exhibits the following statistical findings: in CP, whereas the ratio of total affirmative to negative clauses was 82.39%: 17.61%, that of affirmative to negative topicalization was 90.91%: 9.09%; In ÆcHom, whereas the ratio of total affirmative to negative clauses was 92.06%: 7.94%, that of affirmative to negative topicalization was 95.16%: 4.84%. Even though the ratio of negative topicalization was lower than that of the total negative clauses by 1: 0.52 in CP and 1: 0.61 in ÆcHom, respectively, the negative topicalization was yet regularly found in OE. It is thus concluded that, contra Kemenade (1997a, b) and Fischer et al. (2000), topicalization in negative sentences was not rare or grammatically marginal but a robust and well-established construction in OE, and ne was already weakened and lost its constituent status in OE.

목차

1. 서론
2. 고대영어 화제화와 부정문
3. 기존연구의 주장
4. 본고의 주장
5. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-740-014914661