메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기상학회 Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences Vol.44 No.1
발행연도
2008.2
수록면
69 - 83 (15page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The exchanges of CO₂ and water vapor over a rice paddy field have been examined with a two-layer canopy model (mSPA model). Four cases were selected for detailed examination during growing season (June to September in 2003). Case 1 is characterized by low LAI, small root biomass and high vapor pressure deficit while Case 2 is characterized by near maximum LAI, large root biomass and moderate vapor pressure deficit. Cases 3 and 4 are characterized by senescence period. The simulated diurnal variations of turbulent fluxes agree well with observations in Cases 1 and 2. However, the model fails to simulate both latent heat and CO₂ fluxes during late growing season (Cases 3 and 4). These errors were investigated in terms of the assimilation and stomatal conductance (A-g<SUB>s</SUB>) relationship and the result indicated the need to consider seasonality of A-g<SUB>s</SUB> relationship and biophysical parameter for accurate simulation of water vapor and CO₂ fluxes during late growing season. Sensitivity test was performed to investigate the influence of uncertainties (±30%) of prescribed model parameters on simulated cumulative GPP and evaporation during growing season. The cumulative evaporation showed little sensitivity to both LAI and V<SUP>cmax</SUP> due to compensating effect of soil evaporation while the cumulative GPP showed a larger sensitivity to LAI (9-16%) than V<SUP>cmax</SUP> (6-9%). For hydraulic parameters such as stem hydraulic conductivity and root resistivity, model showed little sensitivity. It is due to low water stress during the growing season in Korea.

목차

Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Material and Method
3. Results
4. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (30)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-453-016469925