지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2006.5
- 수록면
- 105 - 116 (12page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In product manufacturing industries, a recent issue is the green concept. The green concept is a complicated area. If the green concept is for products, its serious issues have to be criticized. Although the importance of the green concept has overflowed, its influences have not been disputed vigorously. So this study is to critic the serious issues of the green concept in aesthetics in product design, manufacturing, and products' prices. The green environment has four representative elements: systems, policies, minds, and technologies, but they are not in the field of design.
An element of the green concept, green design is also a sub concept for design, so it should be based on aesthetics. It is green aesthetics. But since green design first appeared, it has never approached by aesthetics because it has mostly had social meanings and expectations. So for green aesthetics, to think about what makes a product, and what can be aesthetic issues among them are important. Products consist of form, structure, material, and technology. Form means different shapes in a structure, but there cannot be any specific directions for a green concept. Structure has two kinds: interior and exterior structure. While interior structure has a technological character, exterior structure is deeply related with aesthetics, but it has also no chance for green concept. Material can be divided as two also: aesthetic and technological. Aesthetics materials mean the colors, opacity, and tactile sense of materials, but they are not aesthetic issues. Technological materials are recycled materials or non-recycled materials. Even if recycled materials are used today, they are close to systems or policies rather than aesthetics. With this result, green aesthetics is a very difficult concept.
Second, green products are usually 30% more expensive than general products. But every consumer has his or her own economical conditions, and nobody can coerce consumers into buying expensive green products for green environments. And green products without good quality cannot satisfy consumers. This means that green concept is not accomplished by just manufacturing green products.
Third, although a lot of proposals have appeared as green design in exhibitions, most of them are close to craft because they are so hard to be manufactured. Manufacturing is the first consideration for products.
These three issues are enough to explain why green concept is complicated in manufacturing products. If they are not solved, the green concept is just a fiction. So if this study proposes a turning point against blind green-oriented atmosphere, it will be meaningful enough.
An element of the green concept, green design is also a sub concept for design, so it should be based on aesthetics. It is green aesthetics. But since green design first appeared, it has never approached by aesthetics because it has mostly had social meanings and expectations. So for green aesthetics, to think about what makes a product, and what can be aesthetic issues among them are important. Products consist of form, structure, material, and technology. Form means different shapes in a structure, but there cannot be any specific directions for a green concept. Structure has two kinds: interior and exterior structure. While interior structure has a technological character, exterior structure is deeply related with aesthetics, but it has also no chance for green concept. Material can be divided as two also: aesthetic and technological. Aesthetics materials mean the colors, opacity, and tactile sense of materials, but they are not aesthetic issues. Technological materials are recycled materials or non-recycled materials. Even if recycled materials are used today, they are close to systems or policies rather than aesthetics. With this result, green aesthetics is a very difficult concept.
Second, green products are usually 30% more expensive than general products. But every consumer has his or her own economical conditions, and nobody can coerce consumers into buying expensive green products for green environments. And green products without good quality cannot satisfy consumers. This means that green concept is not accomplished by just manufacturing green products.
Third, although a lot of proposals have appeared as green design in exhibitions, most of them are close to craft because they are so hard to be manufactured. Manufacturing is the first consideration for products.
These three issues are enough to explain why green concept is complicated in manufacturing products. If they are not solved, the green concept is just a fiction. So if this study proposes a turning point against blind green-oriented atmosphere, it will be meaningful enough.
목차
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Aspect
3. Significant issues of the green concept
4. Conclusions
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Green Product를 둘러싼 가설들 : 가전제품을 중심으로
한국디자인학회 국제학술대회 논문집
2004 .10
-
Say "Green"
International Invitation Exhibition of Color Works
2016 .11
-
Ever Green
International Invitation Exhibition of Color Works
2016 .11
-
GREEN
International Invitation Exhibition of Color Works
2016 .11
-
Green Area
International Invitation Exhibition of Color Works
2016 .11
-
Y-Green
International Invitation Exhibition of Color Works
2016 .11
-
Discovery of the Green : What is your green life?
International Invitation Exhibition of Color Works
2016 .11
-
Green environment and Design Change
한국디자인학회 국제초대전도록
2014 .05
-
Green City
International Invitation Exhibition of Color Works
2016 .11
-
Green Light
International Invitation Exhibition of Color Works
2016 .11
-
디자인 개발과정에서의 green design 요인에 관한 연구 : green design의 인식전환을 중심으로
Archives of Design Research
1995 .12
-
Dimensions of Green
International Invitation Exhibition of Color Works
2016 .11
-
Green Bear
International Invitation Exhibition of Color Works
2016 .11
-
Green Creative
한국디자인학회 국제초대전도록
2014 .05
-
Green and Skin
International Invitation Exhibition of Color Works
2016 .11
-
Dancing Green 2014-6
한국디자인학회 국제초대전도록
2014 .05
-
Dancing Green 2015-5
한국디자인학회 국제초대전도록
2015 .05
-
Leaves in Green
International Invitation Exhibition of Color Works
2016 .11
-
그린디자인 개발을 위한 그린기술 정보제공 서비스 구축 1
한국디자인학회 국제학술대회 논문집
2010 .10
-
Green Lighting 2016
International Invitation Exhibition of Color Works
2016 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
가독성, 눈의 피로함에 대한 웹 사이트 배경색의 영향
우서혜
,
이현주
Archives of Design Research
2008
.05
정서적 디자인 중 “본능적 디자인”에 대한 미학적 연구
박연실
Archives of Design Research
2008
.02
한국 단편애니메이션의 미학과 정체성
염동철
Archives of Design Research
2011
.11
심미성을 바탕으로 한 화장품 용기 선호도 분석 : 여성용 에센스와 남성스킨 용기를 중심으로
김현정
,
홍정표
,
양종열
한국디자인학회 국제학술대회 논문집
2004
.10
가전제품 제조기업의 지속가능 발전을 위한 분산 조립 시스템
김우진
Archives of Design Research
2011
.05
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-658-015968148