메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국의사결정학회 의사결정학연구 의사결정학연구 제14집 제1호
발행연도
2006.6
수록면
67 - 101 (35page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Technological change is the primary factors which influence the fate of organization. The enterprise which carry out the suitable technological innovation can survive in the market. There are two types of innovations. One is product innovation. The other is process innovation. Both product and process innovation are very important to the technological success of an enterprise. The first main purposes of this study is to expound the relationship between product innovation and process innovation. Secondly, the enterprises disposed to technological change divide into four types of organizations on the basis of the different innovation style. The four types are product innovation organization, process innovation organization, ambidextrous innovation organization and inertia organization. According to the different characteristics of the four types, we divides main motor vehicle enterprises in Korea, China and Japan into four type organizations: Honda Vehicle Corporation as product innovation central organization, Hyundai Vehicle Corporation and Shanghai Volkswagen Vehicle Corporation as process innovation central organization, Toyota Vehicle Corporation as ambidextrous innovation organization and Daewoo Vehicle Corporation as inertia organization. Then we can grasp each main vehicle corporation s innovation style and technological strategy. Meanwhile the three country s vehicle corporations relative positions and competitive power orders can be comprehended. The result of this study is that ambidextrous innovation organization which perform well both radical innovation and process improvement is the most of a family competitive power, just like Toyota Vehicle Corporation. And the second competitive power organization is the product innovation central organization as Honda Vehicle Corporation, the third one is process innovation central organization as Hyundai Vehicle Corporation and Shanghai Volkswagen Vehicle Corporation. The last one is the inertia organization which is insensitive to changes or lives up to the successful formality of past. For example, Daewoo Vehicle Corporation fall under this category.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 혁신방향에 따른 조직의 혁신특성
3. 한국ㆍ중국ㆍ일본자동차 기업들의 혁신특성
4. 한국ㆍ중국ㆍ일본자동차 기업들의 유형과 성과
5. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-325-016678772