메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
서울행정학회 한국사회와 행정연구 한국사회와 행정연구 제13권 제3호
발행연도
2002.11
수록면
239 - 263 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Recently, conflicts between local governments and residents are growing more serious in relation to constructing unwanted facilities. But there are few satisfactory cases of conflict resolution through both sides' interaction in Korea. So this study analyzed the structure of locational conflicts selecting the case of Kangnam incinerator construction and presented suggestions. The following points were found as a results of this study. The deciding factor in the beginning stages of the conflict was the participating procedures open to residents. The government's perfunctory management of this process only led to a wider distrust for the government. And the issues of economic compensation and the capacity of the incinerator rose as the major concerns between both sides. The awareness and behavior of the residents were discovered to be changing as a result of the declining information asymmetry made possible by learning process and by the rise of a sense of social justice in civil opposition. the introduction of local autonomy, the following increase of self-governments' autonomy and supporting activities of the environmental organizations have created an environment more amenable for residents to voice their opposition. So the local government's traditionally coercive strategy in dealing with locational conflict has transformed into a conflict-management strategy focusing on negotiations with residents. The efficacy of negotiations, however, still remains low due to the lack of relevant institutions. In effect, the revision of the policy objective - the downsizing of the capacity of the incinerator - manifested itself as conflict-management strategy, ultimately debasing policy effectiveness. From these points of view, a more substantial and institutionalized civil participation mechanism, a more reasonable and diversified economic compensation system, institutional supplementation to the negotiation process, and an establishment of cooperation between local governments are needed.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. 입지갈등에 관한 이론적 논의
Ⅲ. 사례분석
Ⅳ. 입지과정의 특징과 정책적 함의
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-350-016530969