메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
서울행정학회 한국사회와 행정연구 한국사회와 행정연구 제15권 제2호
발행연도
2004.8
수록면
395 - 426 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the educational programs in Seoul Woman’s Development Center. For this study, the author divides it into two parts: the quantitative aspect and the quality aspect. The author selects the input and output indicators as a standard to evaluate the quantitative aspect, the satisfaction and the influenced factors as a standard to evaluate the quality aspect, and derives a indicator. And this study compares the forms to be managed directly by public agency to make sure the evaluation of contracting-out.
The major findings of this study could be summarized as follows:
1) As the quantitative aspect of the evaluation, the forms under direct management of Seoul Metropolitan City are more efficient than the contracting-out forms in the number of student, the ratio of completion, the qualification acquisition and the Adoption of a profession. Therefore, the service cost are less expensive in the forms under direct management of Seoul Metropolitan City.
2) As the quality aspect of evaluation, it is as follows the factor which has been influenced the educational programs in the forms under direct management of Seoul Metropolitan City: the education contents, the quality of lecturer and the cost. However, it is as follows the factor which has been influenced the educational programs in the contracting-out forms: the education contents and the cost.
3) There are differences of the mean between the two form in the quality of lecturer, the teaching method and the cost. That is to say, I can conclude that the forms under direct management of Seoul Metropolitan City is higher than the contracting-out forms in the mean.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 선행연구 및 분석틀의 설정
Ⅲ. 조사설계 및 분석
Ⅳ. 비교 논의 및 결론
〈참고문헌〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-350-016528654