지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
On the occasion of Hwang's research achievement and the following syndrome Korea and world have faced a danger that life is manipulated, instrumentalized, and that bio-industry is oriented to a commercial interest, The arbitrary genetic manipulation will produce an irreversible destruction of the life order. As an undertaking of Babel tower building in the 21st century it can produce a kind of result such as destruction of mankind.
His research team does not see the embryo as a life. It views the position of the embryo as a mere cell lump. It acknowledges the embryo after plantation in the uterus as a life. His team regards embryonic stem cell as a mere cell lump. The act to produce another cell lump from one cell lump makes no ethical problems at all. Such an embryonic study is a crucial medical act in future for patients suffering from incurable disease and their families.
Hwang's team has a buddhistic life-view of life transmigration to save a human, a big cell lump through a cell, a minute unit of life. Such a view that an embryo is a mere cell lump has a high possibility to expand into materialism that an adult is also a cell lump. However, the Christian bio-ethics argues human life is itself a purpose, it can not become an instrument. This defames the human dignity.
1) Facing the technology that does not stop but accelerate by the motivation of utilitarianism and commercialism, Korean church needs to be aware of the life ethics and to carry out the life ethics campaigns to practise it. 2) Life engineers need to develop the adult stem research that does not destroy embryonic life and to make efforts to practise it on the suffering patients. 3) Christianity needs to set up the life ethics appropriate to genetic engineering and to suggest it as an alternative to scientists and medical practicians.
The scientists dealing with human life are asked to be ethically responsible for life and to get an attitude to follow the social consensus. Korean church needs to reconfirm the absolute sovereignty of God over life and to plant a right vision of communal value such as life reverence and human right.
His research team does not see the embryo as a life. It views the position of the embryo as a mere cell lump. It acknowledges the embryo after plantation in the uterus as a life. His team regards embryonic stem cell as a mere cell lump. The act to produce another cell lump from one cell lump makes no ethical problems at all. Such an embryonic study is a crucial medical act in future for patients suffering from incurable disease and their families.
Hwang's team has a buddhistic life-view of life transmigration to save a human, a big cell lump through a cell, a minute unit of life. Such a view that an embryo is a mere cell lump has a high possibility to expand into materialism that an adult is also a cell lump. However, the Christian bio-ethics argues human life is itself a purpose, it can not become an instrument. This defames the human dignity.
1) Facing the technology that does not stop but accelerate by the motivation of utilitarianism and commercialism, Korean church needs to be aware of the life ethics and to carry out the life ethics campaigns to practise it. 2) Life engineers need to develop the adult stem research that does not destroy embryonic life and to make efforts to practise it on the suffering patients. 3) Christianity needs to set up the life ethics appropriate to genetic engineering and to suggest it as an alternative to scientists and medical practicians.
The scientists dealing with human life are asked to be ethically responsible for life and to get an attitude to follow the social consensus. Korean church needs to reconfirm the absolute sovereignty of God over life and to plant a right vision of communal value such as life reverence and human right.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 물질주의적 생명관 : 배아는 세포에 불과
Ⅲ. 난자 확보과정의 윤리적 문제
Ⅳ. 성경적 생명관: 배아는 생명체
Ⅴ. 대안 - 성체줄기세포연구
Ⅵ. 과학기술주의의 세계관
Ⅶ. 유전자 공학의 이중성
Ⅷ. 행복주의 사고의 한계
Ⅸ. 공리주의와 포퓰리즘에 편승한 국가의 생명정책
Ⅹ. 생명 살리기 운동 ; 한국교회의 역할
ⅩⅠ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (23)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
A Critical Study on Human Embryonic Stem : Cell Research from a Christian Life Ethical Perspective
한국기독교신학논총
2003 .07
-
Life
Korea Journal
1972 .08
-
배아복제 및 연구에 대한 비교 윤리적 방법론
기독교사회윤리
2009 .01
-
배아줄기세포 연구에 대한 한국교회의 입장 연구
신학과 목회
2016 .05
-
Stem Cell Research, Therapeutic Cloning, and the Ethics of Embryo Destruction
철학사상
2004 .06
-
인간줄기세포 연구에 대한 에코페미니즘의 비판적 성찰
한국기독교신학논총
2006 .04
-
배아 줄기세포 연구 관련 윤리논쟁과 기독교신앙
대학과 복음
2005 .12
-
배아줄기세포연구의 생명윤리담론 분석 : 한국 기독교와 불교를 중심으로
종교문화연구
2012 .06
-
‘삶의 질’과 ‘생명의 신성함’ 생명윤리
인간연구
2007 .07
-
생명에 대한 존재론적 인식과 생명미학적 정치
철학탐구
2014 .11
-
인간배아의 도덕적 지위
기독교사회윤리
2005 .01
-
초기 유대교, 예수와 바울의 생명 사상 : 신약성경에서의 생명 진술에 나타난 윤리
한국기독교신학논총
2012 .04
-
생명윤리적 관심을 통해 본 기독교인성교육의 과제
대학과 복음
2002 .10
-
배아줄기세포 연구에 대한 불교적 관점
철학논총
2012 .01
-
Stem Cell, Human Cloning and the Ethics of Life
한국기독교신학논총
2006 .05
-
생명의 존엄성 : 인간배아 줄기세포 연구 논쟁에 관한 신학적 고찰
신학논단
2006 .02
-
배아복제의 찬반논변에 관한 윤리학적 성찰
기독교사회윤리
2005 .01
-
黃順元 小說 硏究 : 「神들의 주사위」를 중심으로
동아인문학
2004 .12
-
1990년대 초 이래의 한국기독교 사회윤리학의 동향
신학연구
2007 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-235-017562909