메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한국토·도시계획학회 국토계획 國土計劃 第29卷 第2號
발행연도
1994.5
수록면
193 - 221 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Quality of Life and Residential Satisfaction by two types of rural areas namely shallow and remote rural(or fringe rural and rural area) was examined in Korea for a sample of 308 farmers and part-time farmers. These two group differ in their personal characteristic by their location and their housing contexts. They showed no differences in their levels of satisfaction in two domains of satisfaction(dwelling satisfaction and community satisfaction), but showed significant differneces in their evaluation of several community attributes.
A factor analysis model of Q. O. L. for entire sample explain 52% of the variation with five groups of factors : factor 1 is named by ‘Saving and Income’, factor 2 by ‘Residential Satisfaction’, factor 3 by ‘Rural life and Prospect’, factr 4 by ‘Education/Leisure Satisfaction’ and factor 5 by ‘Job Satisfaction.’
A regression model of residential satisfaction with three domain satisfaction (dwelling, village and community) as dependent variables was tested in two different contexts (shallow and romote rural). In community level the service quality and distance of medical facilities are the main predicators of community satisafction, in village level the familiarity with their neighbors is the main predicators of village satisfaction, and indwelling level the convenience of the housing and utilities are the main predicators of dwelling satisfaction.
However the other composite and contextual predicators of satisfaction in 3-level are significantly differ in their corelates. A theory of residential satisfaction is developed and used in the test of regression model, and it is concluded that the source of satisfaction are not similar between residents of different context The contextual approach is suggested through the comparison of two rural types into the model.

목차

ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론(Introduction)
Ⅱ. 이론적 잇슈(Theoretical Issues)
Ⅲ. 연구방법(Method)
Ⅳ. 결과 및 고찰(Results)
Ⅴ. 결론
參考文獻

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-539-017458221