지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
For the analysis of mortality differentials by socioeconomic factors based on death registration data, we have considered four variables : place of residence, educational attainment, marital status and occupation. The age range adopted were 5 to 64 years of age for place of residence, and 25 to 64 years of age for the other factors. The mortality differentials by socioeconomic variables were clear and in the expected direction : mortality levels among urban residents, better educated groups, and non-agricultural workers were lower than among the other sub-groups.
The average mortality level in rural areas is much higher than in urban areas : the rural mortality levels were at least double the urban levels at ages below 40 years, but became smaller after age 40, and no clear differentials by urban / rural residence increased until 1974~76 for the both sexes, but since the then differentials have declined slowley for both sexes. This changing pattern of mortality differentials by place of residence can be explained by historical socioeconomic development : the development generally started in urban areas, and rural areas followed : in the course of socioeconomic development the differences between the death rates in the two areas became smaller and finally the mortality levels in the two areas became nearly the same, as is found in the developed countries nowadays.
The inverse relationships between mortality and educational level became stronger between the periods 1970~72 and 1984~86, but showed the same atterns of mortality differentials in both period : larger differences among the younger age groups, and for males, than among the older age groups, and for females. The increasing mortality differentials in the fourteen-year period between 1970~72 and 1984~86 were caused by inadequate living standards of the non-educated, whose proportion in the total population, however, dropped sharply during that period. Also, the much lower proportions of low - educated groups or of persons with no formal education among males than females helped to establish the clearly pronounced differentials.
The mortality differentials by marital status in Korea showed the usual pattern : the mortality rates of the married in each age and sex group were clearly lower than those of others during the fourteen-year period between 1970~72 and 1984~86. In Korean society which romotes universal marriage, the never married recorded especially high death rates, presumably mainly because of ill - health, but also possibly because of the stigma attached to celibacy. However, the mortality differentials by marital status changed with the changes in the proportionate distribution by marital status during the period : the differences between the death rates of the married and never married groups became smaller, the proportion of the never married group increased : in contrast, the differences between mortalities of the married and widowed / divorced / separated groups widened, with the decrease in the proportion of the later group ; this tendency was perticularly marked for females.
Occupational groups also showed clear mortality differences : among four occupational groups mortality of males was highest among agricultural workers and lowest among ‘professional, administrative and clerical workers’. However, when the death rates were standardized by educational level, the death rates by occupation in age group 45~64 years were nearly the same (excet for the mixed group consisting of unemployed, students, military servicemen and unknown). Therefore, the clear mortality dfferentials by occupation in Korea resulted mainly from the differences in educational level between different occupation groups.
Since socioeconomic characteristics are related to each other, the net effect of each variable was examined. Each of the three variables - ducational level, marital status and urban / rural residence affected significantly Korean adult mortality when the effects of the other variables were controlled. Among the three variables educational level was the most important factor for the determination of the adult mortality level. When male's occupation was added to the above three variables, the effects of occupation on adult mortality were notably smaller after control for the effects of the other three variables while the net effects of these three variables were nearly the same irrespectively whether occupation was included or not. Thus, the differences in educational level(mainly), place of residence and marital status bring out the clear differences in observed mortality levels by occupation.
The average mortality level in rural areas is much higher than in urban areas : the rural mortality levels were at least double the urban levels at ages below 40 years, but became smaller after age 40, and no clear differentials by urban / rural residence increased until 1974~76 for the both sexes, but since the then differentials have declined slowley for both sexes. This changing pattern of mortality differentials by place of residence can be explained by historical socioeconomic development : the development generally started in urban areas, and rural areas followed : in the course of socioeconomic development the differences between the death rates in the two areas became smaller and finally the mortality levels in the two areas became nearly the same, as is found in the developed countries nowadays.
The inverse relationships between mortality and educational level became stronger between the periods 1970~72 and 1984~86, but showed the same atterns of mortality differentials in both period : larger differences among the younger age groups, and for males, than among the older age groups, and for females. The increasing mortality differentials in the fourteen-year period between 1970~72 and 1984~86 were caused by inadequate living standards of the non-educated, whose proportion in the total population, however, dropped sharply during that period. Also, the much lower proportions of low - educated groups or of persons with no formal education among males than females helped to establish the clearly pronounced differentials.
The mortality differentials by marital status in Korea showed the usual pattern : the mortality rates of the married in each age and sex group were clearly lower than those of others during the fourteen-year period between 1970~72 and 1984~86. In Korean society which romotes universal marriage, the never married recorded especially high death rates, presumably mainly because of ill - health, but also possibly because of the stigma attached to celibacy. However, the mortality differentials by marital status changed with the changes in the proportionate distribution by marital status during the period : the differences between the death rates of the married and never married groups became smaller, the proportion of the never married group increased : in contrast, the differences between mortalities of the married and widowed / divorced / separated groups widened, with the decrease in the proportion of the later group ; this tendency was perticularly marked for females.
Occupational groups also showed clear mortality differences : among four occupational groups mortality of males was highest among agricultural workers and lowest among ‘professional, administrative and clerical workers’. However, when the death rates were standardized by educational level, the death rates by occupation in age group 45~64 years were nearly the same (excet for the mixed group consisting of unemployed, students, military servicemen and unknown). Therefore, the clear mortality dfferentials by occupation in Korea resulted mainly from the differences in educational level between different occupation groups.
Since socioeconomic characteristics are related to each other, the net effect of each variable was examined. Each of the three variables - ducational level, marital status and urban / rural residence affected significantly Korean adult mortality when the effects of the other variables were controlled. Among the three variables educational level was the most important factor for the determination of the adult mortality level. When male's occupation was added to the above three variables, the effects of occupation on adult mortality were notably smaller after control for the effects of the other three variables while the net effects of these three variables were nearly the same irrespectively whether occupation was included or not. Thus, the differences in educational level(mainly), place of residence and marital status bring out the clear differences in observed mortality levels by occupation.
목차
Ⅰ. 序言
Ⅱ. 資料와 分析方法
Ⅲ. 人口學的, 經濟ㆍ社會的 差別死亡力
Ⅳ. 死亡水準의 決定要因 : 多變量分析 結果
Ⅴ. 要約 및 結言
參考文獻
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
最近 韓國社會의 差別死亡力 : 敎育水準(1991-2010)을 中心으로
한국사회학회 사회학대회 논문집
2013 .06
-
시도의 사망원인별 사망력
한국인구학
2003 .12
-
혼인상태별 사망력 차이 : 1990~2010
한국인구학
2015 .09
-
韓國 死亡率의 變動과 構造分析
한국인구학
1986 .07
-
우리나라의 초고령 사망률의 확장에 대한 연구
조사연구
2011 .01
-
한ㆍ일 사망원인별 사망력 비교
한국인구학
1999 .06
-
서울특별시 사망률 변이 및 관련 특성 분석
보건행정학회지
2018 .01
-
The Determinants of Infant and Child Mortality in Korea: 1955-1973
한국인구학
1986 .12
-
인구이동과 지역의 차별사망력
한국사회학회 사회학대회 논문집
2003 .12
-
Trends in Educational Differentials in Suicide Mortality between 1993 - 2006 in Korea
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2010 .05
-
美國의 日本占領統治(1945~1952)와 日本의 韓國占領統治(1905~1910)의 比較硏究 : 正當性을 中心으로
법정논총
1980 .02
-
한국과 일본 대학생의 직업관에 대한 비교연구
아시아교육연구
2001 .09
-
Review of Korean Mortality Measures and Related Problems
人口問題論集
1973 .12
-
환경산업의 유망직업 추출에 관한 연구 - 델파이 조사를 중심으로 -
환경교육
2004 .07
-
환경산업 분야 직업실태 조사 연구
환경교육
2004 .12
-
A Study of the Dynamics of Gender Composition Change in U.S. Occupations, 1971-2010
한국사회학회 심포지움 논문집
2018 .05
-
最近의 死亡패턴에 관한 考察
한국인구학
1985 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-322-017311968