메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
서양미술사학회 서양미술사학회논문집 서양미술사학회 논문집 제10집
발행연도
1998.12
수록면
115 - 136 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This thesis is a study on the aspects and implications of feminist video art. It seeks to examine how feminism engages in, and operates on, the genre of video art to effect a distinctly feminist practice. The intervention of feminism in video signifies an encounter between the two major modes of postmodem discourse, video and feminism. While video may be a characteristically postmodem medium, in artistic practice, it tends to be formalizes its properties. This thesis advances the argument that it is the intervention of feminism in the contradictory condition of video art - a postmodem medium which is nevertheless amenable to the formalist logic of modernism - which enables video’s transition toward a more content-directed, socially-conscious postmodem art form. This is the primary significance of the encounter between video art and feminism, and of feminist video.
The basic proposition of this thesis is the distinction between ‘aesthetic video’ and ‘political video’. Aesthetic video is related to the work that formalizes the medium’s property, while political video uses video as an information and communication tool. By the same token, feminist video can be distinguished into two categories of ‘aesthetic feminist video’ and ‘political feminist video’. The former, based on essentialist feminism, relies on aesthetics of narcissism, and the latter, derived from socialist feminism, proclaims anti/trans-narcissism.
The first generation of feminist video (late 60’s - early 80’s) was grounded on the dichotomy of ‘aesthetics/politics’. On the other hand, the second generation (late 80’s ­90’s) evolved from the union of the two elements or the collapse of the dichotomy. While the first generation artists were mostly concerned with the issue of narcissism, the next generation became more focused on the sexuality and representation, but also the reinterpretation of the body extending sexual politics into body politics. It provides a powerful breakthrough for today’s feminism which attempts to deconstruct phallocentric hegemony by including ‘man trouble’ in issues of feminism. Thus, feminism video started with the conflict between aesthetics/politics, essentialism/ socialism, and narcissism/anti-narcissism, and now has proceeded into the stage of deconstructing such oppositions. This indicates the shift from narcissism to the grotesque, which is the point that this thesis attempts to clarify.
In this regard, this thesis brings out narcissism and the grotesque as the main characteristics of feminist video. Narcissism is the typical aesthetics of early video art established by Rosalind Krauss and at the same time feminine aesthetics as being a frequent motif of feminist art in general. If narcissism is considered as a first generation issue, then the grotesque is referred to the second generation. The grotesque, characterized by 90’s video, performance, and body art, is identified with the feminine grotesque, and thus becomes the focal point of today’s feminist art debate. Narcissism and the grotesque are not new concepts. However, this thesis attempts to extend the two concepts by distinguishing narcissism as video aesthetics and narcissism as feminine aesthetics, and connecting the grotesque to the ‘cyborg’, respectively. In short, this thesis induces narcissism and the grotesque as the main issues of feminist video and makes an effort to extend the two concepts.
At a time when women video artists are more active than ever, it seems necessary to undertake an assessment of the significance of feminist video art. It is hoped that this study will be followed by further research by others on this important subject, and also that it will lead to a new understanding of feminism and a re-examination of video art, which is now widely accepted as a genre of contemporary art. Lastly, due to practical considerations, the scope of the present research has been limited, regrettably, to only American artists and their works.

목차

1. 서언
2. 제1세대 나르시즘 비디오
3. 제2세대 그로테스크 비디오
4. 결어
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-609-017289614