메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국현대영미드라마학회 현대영미드라마 현대영미드라마 제17권 제2호
발행연도
2004.8
수록면
49 - 73 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
What appears repeatedly in Beckett's dramatic works is what amounts to an autobiographical or biographical voice which speaks of someone's remembrance or life by time. Most interesting thing is that his works impose certain strains over the distinction between autobiography and biography, and moreover, over forms of biography as a discourse on personal identity. Beckett's later works turn more and more into monologues and in several of his works, a single actor or even a voice leads the play to the end. Considering the convention that a monologue involves disclosure of the inner thoughts of the speaker, the memory that is narrated is generally accepted as something connected with the narrator. However, in Beckett's dramatic works, the subject of the life that the actor or voice represents remains uncertain. It is unclear whether the subject of the life represented is identical to the subject of the voice that is narrating the life or to another individual. This draws the biographical nature of the works increasingly towards a strained situation. If there is a tension inherent in an autobiographical work, it could be an irreducible discrepancy between self and his or her words. As suggested by the word itself, 'autobiography'. the three conditions that constitute an autobiography are 'reflection(auto)', 'life(bio)' and 'writing(graphy)'. Yet these same conditions may be understood as elements that define the tension which is inherently present in autobiography. In Beckett's dramatic works, these conditions are ripped out of the conventions and logical practices. By doing so, the basic elements of drama are scrutinized in a new light, and furthermore, the potential problematic of autobiographical writing are explored to the fullest. The most representative autobiographical pieces among Beckett's dramatic works are Not 1 (1972) and it's brother piece, That Time (1974). In the case of Not I, the central issue in the work is suggested by the title itself, which is self-negation or unacknowledged self. In that sense, the work defies the self-reflecting nature of an autobiographical text. Along with Not I, That Time deals with not only the past life but also approaching or even materialized death, and this reverts a basic condition of autobiography as a writing on 'life'. The degeneration of autobiography into allography or thanatograghy in these works clearly epitomizes issues such as identity, fiction, traces and disintegration which underpin Beckett's works.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 일인칭이라는 허구
Ⅲ. 주인 없는 기억
Ⅳ. 죽은 자의 기억
Ⅴ. 결론
인용문헌
Abstracts

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-842-015564848