지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Quintiliannus was one of the most distinguished rhetorians and educators during the period of Roman Empire. Unlike most other teachers, he came in near contact with governmental power and enjoyed wealth and reputation. After retiring from professorship of rhetoric, he wrote his most famous book De Institutione Oratoria. In this book, he wrote systematically about the art of rhetoric, surveyed synthetic educational theory in order to train an ideal orator, and explained the social role of the orator. Therefore De Institutione Oratoria is not merely a text of rhetoric. but also a book of educational thought.
He defined his ideal orator as a vir bonus dicendi peritus, that is, a good man who can speak well. It was the expression Cato the Elder had used to describe his ideal orator. The reasons why Quintilianus emphasized ethical qualification of an ideal orator could be analyzed as follows. First, he criticised som contemporary philosophers who spoke and conducted irresponsibly and indolently ignoring the real world. He wished the reunification of philosophy and rhetoric made in his ideal orator. Second, he criticised some delatores who ignoring the rhetorical rules used to make harsh speeches in order to beat adversary in court. He wished that they should make better their speeches by studying rhetoric.
The political world in which Quintilianus' ideal orator would play an active part is neither Republic nor Empire. It is an ideal world in which a orator with ethical qualification and oratorical ability combined in him would play a leading part. Quintilianus imagined a political world where Emperor and Senate would avoid exhausting and dangerous confrontation and the vir bonus dicendi peritus would play an important role.
He defined his ideal orator as a vir bonus dicendi peritus, that is, a good man who can speak well. It was the expression Cato the Elder had used to describe his ideal orator. The reasons why Quintilianus emphasized ethical qualification of an ideal orator could be analyzed as follows. First, he criticised som contemporary philosophers who spoke and conducted irresponsibly and indolently ignoring the real world. He wished the reunification of philosophy and rhetoric made in his ideal orator. Second, he criticised some delatores who ignoring the rhetorical rules used to make harsh speeches in order to beat adversary in court. He wished that they should make better their speeches by studying rhetoric.
The political world in which Quintilianus' ideal orator would play an active part is neither Republic nor Empire. It is an ideal world in which a orator with ethical qualification and oratorical ability combined in him would play a leading part. Quintilianus imagined a political world where Emperor and Senate would avoid exhausting and dangerous confrontation and the vir bonus dicendi peritus would play an important role.
목차
1. 서언
2. 『연설가 교육론』과 이상적 연설가상
3. 퀸틸리아누스의 경력과 德性의 강조
4. 이상적 연설가상의 정치적 함의
5. 결어
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
고대 로마의 이상적 연설가(orator perfectus)론
서양고전학연구
2003 .12
-
이태준의 『문장강화』에 대한 수사학적 연구
우리말글
2005 .12
-
서양 중세의 수사학 : 수사학의 그리스도교화를 중심으로
수사학
2006 .03
-
베스파시아누스 황제의 수사학 학교 신설조치의 사회교육적 배경
역사교육
2012 .09
-
중국 수사학의 의미와 연구 동향에 관한 고찰
수사학
2016 .04
-
동서양 비교수사학의 출발점의 대한 제안
서강인문논총
2009 .12
-
세계 속의 한국 수사학 : 한국수사학회 21세기 국제학술교류의 역사
수사학
2015 .09
-
핼리카르나수스의 디오니시우스(Dionysius of Halicarnassus)와 수사비평
외국문학연구
2006 .08
-
Are There Two Different Writers in You? A Study on Contrastive Rhetoric of Korean Students in the US
영어영문학21
2012 .01
-
공자의 수사관(修辭觀) 고찰 : 『논어』를 중심으로
수사학
2015 .12
-
수사학이 유용한 이유들에 대한 검토 : 아리스토텔레스 『수사학』, 1355a20-1355b7을 중심으로
수사학
2019 .04
-
A Rhetoric of the Word of God
한국기독교신학논총
2002 .07
-
복음의 ‘소통’과 ‘설득’을 위한 누가-행전의 수사적 관심 : 고전수사학의 에토스(τò ἦθoς) 개념과 관련하여
신약논단
2015 .09
-
생태비평에 대한 수사학적 분석 : 수사학의 ‘착상’ 개념을 중심으로
수사학
2005 .09
-
修辞学在東方的盛衰変遷 : 兼中日修辞学比较
수사학
2014 .08
-
로마공화정 말기의 역사서술과 수사학 : 키케로와 살루스티우스
서양고전학연구
2016 .03
-
Rhetorical Thought Comparison of Ancient China and Ancient Greece : From Confucius to Aristotle
한국수사학회 학술대회
2006 .11
-
Rhetorical Thought Comparison of Ancient China and Ancient Greece : From Confucius to Aristotle
수사학
2007 .09
-
한국 현대 전통주의 시의 수사학
어문학
2004 .03
-
아리스토텔레스의 수사학에서 성격과 덕 교육
수사학
2012 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-374-015494582