메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
역사교육연구회 역사교육 역사교육 제87집
발행연도
2003.9
수록면
285 - 320 (36page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
There have been general assumptions that members of Ottoman guilds were rigidly controlled by the guild authorities and the government. However, after examining the structure and management of guild membership in seventeenth-century Istanbul, this study proves otherwise at least for that period. An average guild was loosely made of masters(i. e., full members) and apprentices, with a set of guild officials and elders. Neither the government nor the guild attempted to control guild membership for the sake of control. The government did not get involved in the management of guild membership except when it needed to register the members of dubious groups or to muster those who might be useful in emergencies. Whereas guild had to basically determine and manage its membership structure, there were other factors that could compromise the official rules. The guild, while being a collective organism constituted of shops, probably did not exercise full command over its member shops. Individual guild members could bring in outsiders by contracting partnerships and sublets. Shop owners, waqf administrators and renter-investors also seem to have had a say in determining who the new practitioner would be. As long as such room for encroachment did not create new competition or disorder beyond the level that the established guild masters could tolerate, it would not have worried them much. In addition, a guild could be as relaxed as not to object to intruders engaging in their trade as long as the latter paid a fair share of taxes.
The multitude of soldiers and immigrants found in may trades by the mid-seventeenth century is evidence for the flexibility and unintentional "openness" of the guilds. However, the relaxed attitudes of guilds started to change beginning with the service trades that were vulnerable to outside competition. Membership control seems to have gradually strengthened over the next century with the spread of gedik, but probably not to the extent that it stifled any new development. In any event, the fluidity and flexibility of the seventeenth-century guild membership unequivocally show that these groups were not yet the heavily institutionalized guilds of the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.

목차

1. 서론
2. 길드의 범위
3. 회원 구성 및 자격
4. 길드에 합류하는 방법
5. 길드 영역에의 침범자들
6. 결론
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-374-015493616