지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2006.2
- 수록면
- 95 - 102 (8page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
An “architectural work” is the design of a building as embodied in any tangible medium of expression, including a building, architectural plans, or drawings. The work includes the overall form as well as the arrangement and composition of spaces and elements in the design, but does not include individual standard features.
Before the enactment of the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act (AWCPA) of the USA in 1990, the protection of the architectural works in the USA was considered to be inadequate for the American architects. Architectural works created on or after December 1, 1990, are subject to copyright protection. However, even after the enactment, the protection is still insufficient to match with those of European countries. Nevertheless, the AWCPA helps the American architects protect the copyrights on their architectural works. It has been proved by the growing number of lawsuits regarding architectural copyright.
In this study, judicial precedents concerning architectural copyright after the enactment of the AWCPA have been scrutinized to analyze the changes of protection standards for architectural works. The results of this study suggest that the strong demand for the protection of architectural works by American architects is clearly evident and the legal decisions are becoming more and more favourable to architects.
By contrast, Korean judicial precedents concerning architectural copyright are rare for many reasons such as simple ignorance, avoidance of legal challenges, etc.
The aim of this study is to observe American judicial precedents concerning architectural copyright and this will help judging architectural copyright lawsuits in Korea as there are only few judicial precedents.
In addition, to keep their copyrights more strongly, copyright registration of architectural works is highly recommended. The copyright registration is also available for architects in Korea with relatively easy procedure and small costs. This study also intends to be a benchmark for Korean architects who may be involved in copyright lawsuits.
Before the enactment of the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act (AWCPA) of the USA in 1990, the protection of the architectural works in the USA was considered to be inadequate for the American architects. Architectural works created on or after December 1, 1990, are subject to copyright protection. However, even after the enactment, the protection is still insufficient to match with those of European countries. Nevertheless, the AWCPA helps the American architects protect the copyrights on their architectural works. It has been proved by the growing number of lawsuits regarding architectural copyright.
In this study, judicial precedents concerning architectural copyright after the enactment of the AWCPA have been scrutinized to analyze the changes of protection standards for architectural works. The results of this study suggest that the strong demand for the protection of architectural works by American architects is clearly evident and the legal decisions are becoming more and more favourable to architects.
By contrast, Korean judicial precedents concerning architectural copyright are rare for many reasons such as simple ignorance, avoidance of legal challenges, etc.
The aim of this study is to observe American judicial precedents concerning architectural copyright and this will help judging architectural copyright lawsuits in Korea as there are only few judicial precedents.
In addition, to keep their copyrights more strongly, copyright registration of architectural works is highly recommended. The copyright registration is also available for architects in Korea with relatively easy procedure and small costs. This study also intends to be a benchmark for Korean architects who may be involved in copyright lawsuits.
목차
Abstract
1. 서론
2. 미국 내 건축저작물의 보호 역사
3. 건축저작권법 제정 이후 관련 침해 사례 및 판례의 분석
4. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
A Brief Sketch of Architectural Works Copyright with the United States Cases : Analysis based on Thomas Shine v. David M. Childs and Skidmore Owings & Merrill, LLP Case
ARCHITECTURAL RESEARCH
2007 .06
-
건축저작물의 속성과 범주에 관한 연구
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2009 .02
-
국내 저작권법에 규정된 건축저작물 중 ‘설계도서’의 문제점 및 인정 범위에 관한 연구
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2013 .12
-
한미 양국의 건축저작권 침해보상에 관한 비교연구
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2007 .05
-
기획 및 계획설계 단계의 저작권 보호를 위한 연구 : 응용미술저작권과의 비교를 중심으로
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2013 .11
-
국내 저작권법 중 건축 관련 조항의 개정에 관한 연구
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2015 .02
-
A Study on Cognition about Copyright of Digital Works
한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
2017 .05
-
건축표현에 있어서 수사학의 적용에 관한 연구 ( A Study on the Application of Rhetoric to Architectural Expression )
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집 - 계획계
1986 .10
-
권하는 책 - Copyright Explained ( Book Review - Copyright Explained )
건축
1999 .05
-
건축교과의 상대적 중요도에 대한 실무건축가들의 인식
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2007 .02
-
[건축교육제도] 건축학 교육제도에 관한 의식조사
건축
2016 .12
-
건축교육, 무엇이 문제인가?
건축
2001 .08
-
건축설계 논문
건축
2011 .11
-
[건축교육제도] 건축공학 교육제도의 현황, 문제점 파악 설문조사
건축
2016 .12
-
건축사 사무소의 사업성과 작품성에 관한 조사 연구 - 광주광역시를 대상으로 ( A Study on the Business and Art Character of Architectural Work in Architectural Firms )
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집 - 계획계
1997 .04
-
동국대 건축교육 체계 : 건축교육의 다양화
건축
2014 .03
-
[건축교육제도] 건축공학교육의 현재와 개선 방향
건축
2017 .03
-
건설시장 개방에 대한 국내 건축사들의 인식 및 대응방안에 관한 연구 ( A Study on the Architects` Counterplans against Opening the Building Design Market )
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집 - 구조계
1995 .04
-
변화하는 건축
건축사
2011 .01
-
[건축교육제도] 건축교육의 다양화 : 동국대학교 4+2년 건축 교육체계
건축
2017 .07
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
한미 양국의 건축저작권 침해보상에 관한 비교연구
윤춘섭
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2007
.05
건축저작물의 속성과 범주에 관한 연구
윤춘섭
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2009
.02
기획 및 계획설계 단계의 저작권 보호를 위한 연구 : 응용미술저작권과의 비교를 중심으로
김혜정
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2013
.11
건축물 미술작품의 관리에 관한 법적 개선방안 연구
이동기
,
박경신
법학논총
2013
.06
건축저작물의 촬영 및 영리적 배포에 관련된 국내 저작권법 조항의 개선에 관한 연구
윤춘섭
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2010
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-540-015344481