지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this article is to examine the character of Liang Ch'i-ch'ao' view on the modern nation by analyzing the relation of the his historical epistemology with the political thought mutually and structurally. In order to achieve this aims, first of all I have Inquired the main cause of forming ‘new historical treatise' (‘新史學’) of his new historical epistemology. In relation to the modern nation building on the ground of his new historical essay, I have investigated the character and function of ‘the modern view of people' (‘新民') which he had regarded as a cause of nation building. And I have surveyed ‘the theory of the organic nation’(國家有機體說), the theoretical basis of the formation of the state, in relation with historical Darwinism.
In connected with Liang' historical essay, it has been proved that his study of historical essay has been the means to inspire political reforming thought. His intention of new historical treatise through his study of historical essay was in order to establish the constitutional people's right and national sovereignty by means of the China' political reform (constitutional government). His theory of the ‘new historical treatise'(‘新史學’) was built up centering around historical Darwinism on the basis of Chinese tradition and nationalistic Ideology reflecting the Western Imperialism.
His political purpose intending ‘new historical treatise' (‘新史學’)which was composed on the basis of the progressive historical view of the nationalism was to overcome the immediate national crisis by renovating China. The alternative way of the relief of national ruin was to establish constitutional government based on the representative parliamentary system. The constituent to be capable of defend this constitutional government was just the modern people(‘新民’) which was endowed with temperament and capacity to be capable of possessing people' right. The meaning of the modern people(新民) was to be based on Socal Darwinism of the theoretic foundation for realizing national salvation.
Although the nation form the modern view of the people who has the right of constitutional government, Liang had suggested that if there is no state for them, everything intended for the people would be a useless and obstructive thing. Therefore, L'iang had presented nationalistic thought which emphasizing of being the national sovereignty prior to be constitutional government or people's right. While he stressed on preceding of the nation being prior to assuring of the modern view of the people' right, he had accepted Blunstchli' the organic view of the nation and Bornhak' nationalistic thought theory. The theory of Blunstchli's nationalistic organic thought is succeeded to L'iang and became the ideological basis for the formation of the modern constitutional government thought as an alternative of the creation of constitutional modern state for rebuilding of China which was declining to be a semicolony.
In connected with Liang' historical essay, it has been proved that his study of historical essay has been the means to inspire political reforming thought. His intention of new historical treatise through his study of historical essay was in order to establish the constitutional people's right and national sovereignty by means of the China' political reform (constitutional government). His theory of the ‘new historical treatise'(‘新史學’) was built up centering around historical Darwinism on the basis of Chinese tradition and nationalistic Ideology reflecting the Western Imperialism.
His political purpose intending ‘new historical treatise' (‘新史學’)which was composed on the basis of the progressive historical view of the nationalism was to overcome the immediate national crisis by renovating China. The alternative way of the relief of national ruin was to establish constitutional government based on the representative parliamentary system. The constituent to be capable of defend this constitutional government was just the modern people(‘新民’) which was endowed with temperament and capacity to be capable of possessing people' right. The meaning of the modern people(新民) was to be based on Socal Darwinism of the theoretic foundation for realizing national salvation.
Although the nation form the modern view of the people who has the right of constitutional government, Liang had suggested that if there is no state for them, everything intended for the people would be a useless and obstructive thing. Therefore, L'iang had presented nationalistic thought which emphasizing of being the national sovereignty prior to be constitutional government or people's right. While he stressed on preceding of the nation being prior to assuring of the modern view of the people' right, he had accepted Blunstchli' the organic view of the nation and Bornhak' nationalistic thought theory. The theory of Blunstchli's nationalistic organic thought is succeeded to L'iang and became the ideological basis for the formation of the modern constitutional government thought as an alternative of the creation of constitutional modern state for rebuilding of China which was declining to be a semicolony.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 민족주의 진보사관과 ‘新史學’의 정립
Ⅲ. 입헌운동과 ‘新民’건설
Ⅳ. 역사진화론과 국가유기체설
Ⅴ. 결론
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Social Darwinism in Korea and Its Influence on Early Modern Korean Buddhism
International Journal of Korean History
2001 .12
-
近代 Ⅱ (1910~1945)
역사학보
2001 .09
-
近代 Ⅰ (1876~)
역사학보
1999 .09
-
近代Ⅰ(1876~1910)
역사학보
2004 .09
-
最近世(開港~)
역사학보
1996 .12
-
最近世(開港~)
역사학보
1993 .12
-
近代 Ⅰ (1876~1910)
역사학보
2001 .09
-
最近世
역사학보
1990 .12
-
近代Ⅱ(1910~1945)
역사학보
2004 .09
-
近代 Ⅱ(1910~1945)
역사학보
2002 .09
-
最近世
역사학보
1984 .12
-
近代 Ⅱ (1910~)
역사학보
2000 .09
-
近代 Ⅱ (1910~)
역사학보
1999 .09
-
近代 Ⅰ(1876~)
역사학보
2000 .09
-
最近世
역사학보
1987 .12
-
Korea`s Responses to Social Darwinism(I)
Korea Journal
1978 .04
-
Korea’s Response to Social Darwinism (Ⅱ)
Korea Journal
1978 .05
-
근대소설 형성의 조건들
비평문학
2006 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
梁啓超의 국민국가론과 民權ㆍ民族관념(1896-1902)
曺秉漢
서강인문논총
2007
.12
칼 폴라니의 시장사회 비판 연구 : "이중운동" 개념을 중심으로
김영진
국제지역연구
2004
.10
호혜성에 근거한 기본소득 비판에 대한 반론과 한국 사회에서의 그 함축
조현진
통일인문학
2015
.06
신학자의 "개인적인" 신앙과 신학의 "객관적인" 지식 : 칼 포퍼와 마이클 폴라니를 중심으로
오승성
한국기독교신학논총
2012
.01
클리포드 기어츠(Clifford Geertz) 이후의 선교학 : 문화인류학과 선교학의 "문화"에 대한 이해를 중심으로
김상근
한국기독교신학논총
2004
.07
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-014570331