지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship among percieved social support, hope and quality of life of the cancer patients and to gain the baseline data for development of nursing intervention program for promoting quality of life in cancer patients. The design of this study was a cross sectional correlational survey.
The subjects were 20 out and in-cancer patients in 5 general hospitals in Pusan
The data were collected from July 2 to August 1. 2001.
The instruments were the Percieved social support scale(16 items, 5 point scale) had developed by Tae(1986), Hope scale(12 items, 4point scale) developed by Nowotny(1989) and Quality of life scale(31 items, 10 point scale) developed by Tae et al.(2000).
The data was analyzed by the SPSS/PC+ program using frequency & percentage, item mean & standard deviation, t-test, ANOVA & Scheffe test, Pearson's correlation coefficient.
The results of this study was as follows:
1) The item mean score of quality of life was 6.05±1.16 (range 0-10). The heighest score of subarea of the quality of life was the spiritual wellbeing area (7.09±1.63) and the lowest score was social wellbeing area(5.53±1.65),
The mean score of perceived social support was 52.65±10.32 (최저 1, 최고 80). The mean score of family support was32.71±6.66 (range 1- 40) and the mean score of medical team support was 19.93±5.95 (range 1- 40), The mean score of Hope was 37.02±5.64 (range 1- 48).
2) There were statistically significant difference in the score of quality of life according to the life effect of religion(F=3.97, p=0.00), treatment method(F=2.94, p=0.01), area of diagnosis (F=3.48, p=0.01), stage of disease (F=13.74, p= 0.00).
3) There was significant correlation between perceived social support(r=0.44, p=0.000 ; family support: r=0.334, p=0.000, medical support; r=0.395, p=0.000), hope(r=0.563, p= 0.000) and quality of life.
In conclusion, there was a significant relationship among perceived social support, hope and quality of life. Therefore perceived social support, hope intervention programs should be developed to improve the quality of life in cancer patients.
The subjects were 20 out and in-cancer patients in 5 general hospitals in Pusan
The data were collected from July 2 to August 1. 2001.
The instruments were the Percieved social support scale(16 items, 5 point scale) had developed by Tae(1986), Hope scale(12 items, 4point scale) developed by Nowotny(1989) and Quality of life scale(31 items, 10 point scale) developed by Tae et al.(2000).
The data was analyzed by the SPSS/PC+ program using frequency & percentage, item mean & standard deviation, t-test, ANOVA & Scheffe test, Pearson's correlation coefficient.
The results of this study was as follows:
1) The item mean score of quality of life was 6.05±1.16 (range 0-10). The heighest score of subarea of the quality of life was the spiritual wellbeing area (7.09±1.63) and the lowest score was social wellbeing area(5.53±1.65),
The mean score of perceived social support was 52.65±10.32 (최저 1, 최고 80). The mean score of family support was32.71±6.66 (range 1- 40) and the mean score of medical team support was 19.93±5.95 (range 1- 40), The mean score of Hope was 37.02±5.64 (range 1- 48).
2) There were statistically significant difference in the score of quality of life according to the life effect of religion(F=3.97, p=0.00), treatment method(F=2.94, p=0.01), area of diagnosis (F=3.48, p=0.01), stage of disease (F=13.74, p= 0.00).
3) There was significant correlation between perceived social support(r=0.44, p=0.000 ; family support: r=0.334, p=0.000, medical support; r=0.395, p=0.000), hope(r=0.563, p= 0.000) and quality of life.
In conclusion, there was a significant relationship among perceived social support, hope and quality of life. Therefore perceived social support, hope intervention programs should be developed to improve the quality of life in cancer patients.
목차
1. 서론
2. 문헌 고찰
3. 연구대상 및 방법
4. 연구결과
5. 논의
6. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
사회적지지가 암 환자의 삶의 질에 미치는 영향
보건교육건강증진학회지
2010 .12
-
암환자가 지각하는 가족지지가 암환자의 삶의 질에 미치는 영향
호스피스 학술지
2005 .01
-
방사선 치료를 받는 유방암 환자의 가족지지와 성격이 삶의 질에 미치는 영향
대한방사선치료학회지
2002 .01
-
암 환자가 지각한 가족지지와 삶의 질
Asian Oncology Nursing
2009 .02
-
입원 말기암 환자가 지각한 가족지지와 삶의 질의 관계
Asian Oncology Nursing
2008 .02
-
뇌졸중 환자가 지각하는 사회적 지지와 희망과의 관계
재활간호학회지
2001 .06
-
암환자의 희망과 삶의 질과의 관계 연구
성인간호학회지
1996 .06
-
방사선 치료를 받는 자궁경부암 환자의 가족지지와 성격이 삶의 질에 미치는 영향
대한방사선치료학회지
1996 .01
-
일개 시지역 뇌졸중 환자의 삶의 질과 사회적 지지와의 관련성
농촌의학·지역보건
2010 .03
-
손자녀 양육 조부모의 지각된 건강상태, 양육 스트레스 및 사회적 지지가 삶의 질에 미치는 영향
성인간호학회지
2014 .06
-
자조집단 프로그램이 유방절제술 환자의 적응과 삶의 질에 미치는 효과
재활간호학회지
1999 .06
-
Importance of Social Support in Cancer Patients
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
2012 .01
-
유방암 환자의 질병단계에 따른 가족 지지, 스트레스 및 삶의 질의 관계
KJWHN(여성건강간호학회지)
2010 .01
-
치료단계에 따른 여성암 환자의 삶의 질
성인간호학회지
2007 .12
-
심리사회적 중재 프로그램이 재가 암 환자의 우울, 희망 및 삶의 질에 미치는 효과분석
성인간호학회지
2010 .12
-
진단 초기 암환자의 희망구조 파악을 위한 탐색적 연구
Asian Oncology Nursing
2009 .08
-
방사선 치료를 받는 유방암 환자의 삶의 질에 관한 연구
대한방사선치료학회지
2002 .01
-
Quality of Life of Family Members Living with Cancer Patients
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
사회적지지가 암 환자의 삶의 질에 미치는 영향
조희숙
,
김봉기
,
이혜진
외 1명
보건교육건강증진학회지
2010
.12
유방암 환자의 수술 후 심리사회적 적응, 부부친밀도 및 가족지지
조옥희
,
유양숙
Asian Oncology Nursing
2009
.08
유방암 환자의 희망 영향요인
태영숙
,
김미예
Asian Oncology Nursing
2009
.08
암환자의 자가간호역량과 삶의 질과의 관계
정연
성인간호학회지
1993
.09
위암 환자의 근치적 위절제술 후 시기 별 체중, 불안, 우울 및 삶의 질의 변화
김진하
,
최자윤
Asian Oncology Nursing
2014
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-513-014255442