지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
With the reformation of the world securities markets, a great many transnational corporations with only nominal nationality issue stocks in many countries and list on multiple foreign exchanges. Besides, advances in telecommunications, international travel and shipping, and global financial liberalization played a decisive role to merge into an interconnected marketplace, which were once a large number of relatively isolated markets. And also, the development of Internet has given opportunity to an enormous number of investors to buy and sell securities in a public way. However, the increase in "transnational" securities transactions produces greater opportunity to anyone who watches for a chance committing a fraud. To solve these problems, each country should extend the boundary of antifraud laws to largely foreign transactions. In some cases, it may happen that there will be a possibility to give up much-needed protection to their own citizens and markets.
The application of the 1934 Act's antifraud provisions to foreign transactions distorted the scope of American legal system's fairness. Much is damaged as American Courts try to expand the reach of the United States securities laws to cover international transactions. Congress didn't intend the securities laws to inspect the international securities market. It legislated the domestic act covering the world's market scope without proper direction or purpose.
Globalization of securities market places a heavier burden upon countries to investigate improper investment activity because the increase in "transnational" securities transactions produces greater possibility of committing securities fraud. Therefore, there can be assertion that a broader conduct analysis of subject matter jurisdiction should be adopted, but the international system requires a reconsideration of the internationalization of securities fraud and a modification of the doctrines for applying extraterritorial jurisdiction because of political sensitivity. After all, the extrateIlitorial application of the antifraud provisions must be considered both in a manner that the purpose of the 1934 Act should be comprehended and the role of one nation in the internationalized community played should be apprehended.
The application of the 1934 Act's antifraud provisions to foreign transactions distorted the scope of American legal system's fairness. Much is damaged as American Courts try to expand the reach of the United States securities laws to cover international transactions. Congress didn't intend the securities laws to inspect the international securities market. It legislated the domestic act covering the world's market scope without proper direction or purpose.
Globalization of securities market places a heavier burden upon countries to investigate improper investment activity because the increase in "transnational" securities transactions produces greater possibility of committing securities fraud. Therefore, there can be assertion that a broader conduct analysis of subject matter jurisdiction should be adopted, but the international system requires a reconsideration of the internationalization of securities fraud and a modification of the doctrines for applying extraterritorial jurisdiction because of political sensitivity. After all, the extrateIlitorial application of the antifraud provisions must be considered both in a manner that the purpose of the 1934 Act should be comprehended and the role of one nation in the internationalized community played should be apprehended.
목차
서론
역외적용의 역사
법원에 의해 적용되는 기준
사견
결론
參考文獻
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
외화증권 예탁법리의 정립 방향에 관한 고찰 : 대법원 2010. 1. 28. 선고 2008다54587 판결에 대한 평석을 겸하여
국제사법연구
2014 .12
-
관세담보제도에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2004 .08
-
국내주요그룹의 정보보안관리 체계에 관한 사례 연구
경영정보학연구
1998 .01
-
證券去來法의 目的 - 日本에서의 理論的 展開를 中心으로 -
기업법연구
2003 .03
-
기업의 정보보호 공시가 기업가치에 미치는 영향
지식경영연구
2019 .01
-
整合中国的社会保障管理体制的探索
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2013 .10
-
Policy-Based Network Security Management Model for Multiple Security Devices
Telecommunications Review
2004 .01
-
英國法上 外國證券에 대한 公示規制
기업법연구
2005 .09
-
지방공무원의 정보보호 인식 및 행태에 관한 연구
한국사회와 행정연구
2010 .02
-
탈냉전 이후 안보환경의 변화에 따른 신세대 안보인식의 특성
국제관계연구
2007 .09
-
인간안보와 한국 외교
국제관계연구
2001 .03
-
미국법상 회계사, 변호사 등 전문가의 증권사기책임 : 미국의 1934년 증권거래법 제10조 (b)항 및 Rule 10b-5를 중심으로
법학연구
2004 .12
-
기업 보안 유형에 따른 보안사고 대응역량 : 사회기술시스템 이론 관점에서
한국IT서비스학회지
2013 .01
-
국가기간산업에 대한 인수합병시국가안보 심사 규제 방향
법과 정책연구
2009 .01
-
한-EU 해상운송보안 제도 대응전략 비교연구
무역상무연구
2015 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-013558461